Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;24(5):1130-1138.
doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.015. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

The reckoning: The return of genomic results to 1444 participants across the eMERGE3 Network

Affiliations

The reckoning: The return of genomic results to 1444 participants across the eMERGE3 Network

Kathleen A Leppig et al. Genet Med. 2022 May.

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Phase III Network was to return actionable sequence variants to 25,084 consenting participants from 10 different health care institutions across the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate system-based issues relating to the return of results (RoR) disclosure process for clinical grade research genomic tests to eMERGE3 participants.

Methods: RoR processes were developed and approved by each eMERGE institution's internal review board. Investigators at each eMERGE3 site were surveyed for RoR processes related to the participant's disclosure of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and engagement with genetic counseling. Standard statistical analysis was performed.

Results: Of the 25,084 eMERGE participants, 1444 had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant identified on the eMERGEseq panel of 67 genes and 14 single nucleotide variants. Of these, 1077 (74.6%) participants had results disclosed, with 562 (38.9%) participants provided with variant-specific genetic counseling. Site-specific processes that either offered or required genetic counseling in their RoR process had an effect on whether a participant ultimately engaged with genetic counseling (P = .0052).

Conclusion: The real-life experience of the multiarm eMERGE3 RoR study for returning actionable genomic results to consented research participants showed the impact of consent, method of disclosure, and genetic counseling on RoR.

Keywords: Consent; Genetic counseling; Genomic medicine; Return of results; eMERGE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest R.C.G. receives compensation for advising AIA, Applied Therapeutics, Humanity, and Verily and is a cofounder of Genome Medical, Inc, a technology and services company providing genetics expertise to patients, providers, employers, and care systems. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Outcome of disclosure of P/LP variants to eMERGE3 participants.
Diagram illustrating the number of enrolled participants in eMERGE3, participants with return of results, and the breakdown of numbers and reasons why participants did not have return of results. eMERGE3, Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Phase III; LP, likely pathogenic; P, pathogenic.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Genetic counselling and the return process for P/LP results.
Diagram illustrating RoR and genetic counselling for participants, broken down between 3 sites that did not have genetic counselling embedded in RoR (group A: Geisinger, Northwestern University, Vanderbilt University Medical Center) vs the 7 sites that had genetic counselling embedded in their RoR process (group B: Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and Medical Center, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Columbia, Kaiser Permanente of Washington/University of Washington, Mayo, Meharry, Partners HealthCare). eMERGE3, Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Phase III; LP, likely pathogenic; P, pathogenic; RoR, return of results.

References

    1. eMERGE Consortium. Harmonizing clinical sequencing and interpretation for the eMERGE III Network. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105(3):588–605. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.07.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amendola LM, Berg JS, Horowitz CR, et al. The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: integrating genomic sequencing in diverse and medically underserved populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;103(3):319–327. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rehm HL, Berg JS, Brooks LD, et al. ClinGen–the clinical genome resource. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(23):2235–2242. 10.1056/NEJMsr1406261. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weitzel KW, Alexander M, Bernhardt BA, et al. The IGNITE network: a model for genomic medicine implementation and research. BMC Med Genomics. 2016;9:1. 10.1186/s12920-015-0162-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. All of Us Research Program Investigators, Denny JC, Rutter JL, et al. The “All of Us” research program. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(7):668–676. 10.1056/NEJMsr1809937. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources