Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation
- PMID: 35216907
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009
Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation
Abstract
Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation.
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; Clinical practice; Real-world data; Suboptimal/poor ovarian response; r-hFSH; r-hLH.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest TDH and ML are employees of Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. AE and OR are employees of Biopharma, LCC Merck, Moscow, Russian Federation, an affiliate of Merck KGaA. YK received speaker fees/honoraria/grants from MSD, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Besins Healthcare, Gedeon Richter, Abbott, Bayer, and Sun Pharma. Margarita Anshina received speaker fees/honoraria/grants from MSD, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Besins Healthcare, Gedeon Richter, Abbott, Bayer, and Sun Pharma. Vladislav Korsak received speaker fees/honoraria/grants from MSD, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Besins Healthcare, Gedeon Richter, Abbott, Bayer, and Sun Pharma. Karina Sagamonova received speaker fees/honoraria/grants from MSD, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Besins Healthcare, Gedeon Richter, Abbott, Bayer, and Sun Pharma. Igor Baranov received speaker fees/honoraria/grants from MSD and Besins Healthcare. SY reports no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders.Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):544-555. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew360. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28137754 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH): recombinant human luteinizing hormone versus r-hFSH alone in assisted reproductive technology treatment cycles among women aged 35-40 years: A German database study.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Jul;89:102350. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102350. Epub 2023 May 11. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023. PMID: 37320996 Review.
-
Effectiveness of recombinant human FSH: recombinant human LH combination treatment versus recombinant human FSH alone for assisted reproductive technology in women aged 35-40 years.Reprod Biomed Online. 2024 Jun;48(6):103725. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103725. Epub 2023 Nov 12. Reprod Biomed Online. 2024. PMID: 38593745
-
Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Jun 21;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00759-4. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 34154604 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Pergoveris in Assisted Reproductive Technology--ESPART: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment.BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 3;5(7):e008297. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008297. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26141305 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the Administration of 150 or 75 IU of Recombinant LH in Agonist ICSI Cycles Stimulated with Recombinant FSH in Women Aged 35-39: A Comparative Study.J Reprod Infertil. 2023 Oct-Dec;24(4):269-278. doi: 10.18502/jri.v24i4.14154. J Reprod Infertil. 2023. PMID: 38164428 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist protocols on pregnancy outcomes in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4: A randomized controlled trial.Int J Reprod Biomed. 2025 Jun 10;23(3):241-250. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v23i3.18775. eCollection 2025 Mar. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2025. PMID: 40567909 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous