Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May:123:92-99.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

Diagnostic accuracy of the Abbott ID NOW SARS-CoV-2 rapid test for the triage of acute medical admissions

Affiliations

Diagnostic accuracy of the Abbott ID NOW SARS-CoV-2 rapid test for the triage of acute medical admissions

J R Barnacle et al. J Hosp Infect. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: Decisions to isolate patients at risk of having coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the emergency department (ED) must be rapid and accurate to ensure prompt treatment and maintain patient flow whilst minimising nosocomial spread. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays are too slow to achieve this, and near-patient testing is being used increasingly to facilitate triage. The ID NOW severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) assay is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification near-patient test which targets the RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase gene.

Aim: To assess the diagnostic performance of ID NOW as a COVID-19 triage tool for medical admissions from the ED of a large acute hospital.

Methods: All adult acute medical admissions from the ED between 31st March and 31st July 2021 with valid ID NOW and RT-PCR results were included. The diagnostic accuracy of ID NOW [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)] was calculated against the laboratory reference standard. Discrepant results were explored further using cycle threshold values and clinical data.

Findings: Two percent (124/6050) of medical admissions were SARS-CoV-2 positive on RT-PCR. Compared with PCR, ID NOW had sensitivity and specificity of 83.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 75.4-88.7] and 99.5% (95% CI 99.3-99.6), respectively. PPV and NPV were 76.9% (95% CI 69.0-83.2) and 99.6% (95% CI 99.5-99.8), respectively. The median time from arrival in the ED to ID NOW result was 59 min.

Conclusion: ID NOW provides a rapid and reliable adjunct for the safe triage of patients with COVID-19, and can work effectively when integrated into an ED triage algorithm.

Keywords: COVID-19; Emergency department; ID NOW; Near-patient testing; SARS-CoV-2; Triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow-chart. RT-PCR, real-time polymerase chain reaction; ED, emergency department; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CDU, clinical decision unit; ICU, intensive care unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time from arrival at the emergency department (ED) to ID NOW result. Time between arrival at the ED and a valid ID NOW result becoming available was calculated for each admission. These data are presented as a histogram (A) showing the distribution of time to ID NOW result for all admissions (N=6050). Kaplan–Meier time-to-event curves showing the proportion of admissions with a valid ID NOW result within the first 4 h after arrival at the ED are shown (B). 95% confidence intervals are shown. Admissions requiring supplemental oxygen on arrival (red) are compared with admissions not requiring supplemental oxygen on arrival (blue) (B) (N=5816, 3.9% missing data).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UK Government . UK Government; London: 2022. Healthcare in United Kingdom.https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/healthcare Available at: [last accessed January 2022]
    1. Wang D., Hu B., Hu C., Zhu F., Liu X., Zhang J., et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323:1061. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta-Wright A., Macleod C.K., Barrett J., Filson S.A., Corrah T., Parris V., et al. False-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 and a diagnostic risk score: a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to hospital. BMJ Open. 2021;11 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collier D.A., Assennato S.M., Warne B., Sithole N., Sharrocks K., Ritchie A., et al. Point of care nucleic acid testing for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients: a clinical validation trial and implementation study. Cell Rep Med. 2020;1:100062. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wen D., Yang S., Li G., Xuan Q., Guo W., Wu W. Sample-to-answer and routine real-time RT-PCR. J Mol Diagn. 2021;23:665–670. - PMC - PubMed