Pitch-elevation and pitch-size cross-modal correspondences do not affect temporal ventriloquism
- PMID: 35217979
- DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02455-w
Pitch-elevation and pitch-size cross-modal correspondences do not affect temporal ventriloquism
Abstract
Temporal ventriloquism refers to the shift in the perceived timing of a visual stimulus towards a transient auditory stimulus presented close in time. This effect is demonstrated by greater sensitivity of temporal order judgments of two visual stimuli when a sound is presented before the first visual stimulus and after the second visual stimulus. Recent studies suggest that temporal ventriloquism is affected by cross-modal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual elevation but not by correspondence between pitch and visual size. Here we examined the possibility that these results do not reflect a difference in the effects of different types of cross-modal correspondences on temporal ventriloquism but are rather mediated by shifts in visual-spatial attention triggered by preceding auditory stimuli. In Experiment 1, we replicated the results of previous studies that varied with the type of correspondence. Experiment 2 investigated the effects of the second audiovisual stimuli's asynchrony while the first audiovisual stimuli were synchronized. The results, unlike in Experiment 1, revealed that the magnitude of the temporal ventriloquism effect did not change with the congruency of pitch-elevation correspondence. Experiment 3 also indicated that the asynchrony of the first audiovisual stimuli modulated visual discrimination sensitivity irrespective of temporal ventriloquism. These results suggest that cross-modal correspondences do not affect temporal ventriloquism. Greater visual sensitivity when audiovisual stimuli are congruent with pitch-elevation correspondence may be attributable to shifts in visual attention caused by pitches of the preceding auditory stimulus, which speeds up detection of the first visual stimulus.
Keywords: Cross-modal correspondence; Multisensory integration; Temporal ventriloquism; Timing perception; Visual attention.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Cross-modal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual elevation modulates audiovisual temporal recalibration.Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 9;12(1):21308. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25614-3. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36494490 Free PMC article.
-
Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation Affects Temporal Ventriloquism.Perception. 2016 Apr;45(4):409-24. doi: 10.1177/0301006615622320. Perception. 2016. PMID: 26655643
-
Does cross-modal correspondence modulate modality-specific perceptual processing? Study using timing judgment tasks.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):273-284. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02812-3. Epub 2023 Nov 6. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024. PMID: 37932495
-
[Ventriloquism and audio-visual integration of voice and face].Brain Nerve. 2012 Jul;64(7):771-7. Brain Nerve. 2012. PMID: 22764349 Review. Japanese.
-
On the Timing of Signals in Multisensory Integration and Crossmodal Interactions: a Scoping Review.Multisens Res. 2019 Jan 1;32(6):533-573. doi: 10.1163/22134808-20191331. Multisens Res. 2019. PMID: 31137004
Cited by
-
Developing and validating a Japanese version of the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire.Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 23;14:1166543. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1166543. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37425172 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-modal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual elevation modulates audiovisual temporal recalibration.Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 9;12(1):21308. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25614-3. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36494490 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ben-Artzi, E, & Marks, L. E. (1995). Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: Role of stimulus difference. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1151–1162. - DOI
-
- Bernstein, I. H., & Edelstein, B. A. (1971). Effects of some variations in auditory input upon visual choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 241–247. - DOI
-
- Bien, N., Ten Oever, S., Goebel, R., & Sack, A. T. (2012). The sound of size: Crossmodal binding in pitch-size synesthesia: A combined TMS, EEG and psychophysics study. NeuroImage, 59, 663–672. - DOI
-
- Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. - DOI
-
- Brunetti, R., Indraccolo, A., Mastroberardino, S., Spence, C., & Santangelo, V. (2017). The impact of cross-modal correspondences on working memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 819–831. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources