Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jan;133(1):154-161.
doi: 10.1002/lary.30082. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

Effects of Different Voice Rest on Vocal Function After Microlaryngeal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of Different Voice Rest on Vocal Function After Microlaryngeal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hua-Wei Chi et al. Laryngoscope. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the results of a voice handicap index (VHI) scale and acoustic parameters in patients who underwent microlaryngeal surgery followed by either short-duration (voice rest for <7 days) or long-duration (≥7 days) voice rest.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for articles published before March 1, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that measured the voice outcomes of patients after different durations and extents of postoperative voice restriction were included in the meta-analysis.

Results: Four RCTs comprising 112 patients were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Compared with the long-duration voice rest group, the short-duration group exhibited comparable VHI scores (mean difference [MD], -7.01; 95% CI, -16.12 to 2.09; p = 0.13), maximum phonation time (MD, -2.58; 95% CI, -5.42 to 0.26; p = 0.07), and acoustic variables of jitter (MD, -1.25; 95% CI, -3.43 to 0.94; p = 0.26) and shimmer (MD, -0.79; 95% CI, -2.08 to 0.51; p = 0.24). Subgroup analysis for benign pathology and cold instruments studies demonstrated significantly better VHI scores (MD, -14.45; 95% CI, -26.19 to -2.72; p = 0.02 and MD, -15.98; 95% CI, -28.52 to -3.44; p = 0.01, respectively) in the short-duration group.

Conclusions: The limited evidence does not demonstrate benefit in voice outcomes from long-duration voice rest and suggests potential unfavorable effects on compliance and quality of life, providing a rationale for short-duration voice rest after microlaryngeal surgery. More studies are required to determine the optimal duration and extent of postoperative voice rest.

Level of evidence: 1 Laryngoscope, 133:154-161, 2023.

Keywords: Voice Handicap Index; jitter; maximum phonation time; microlaryngeal surgery; shimmer; voice rest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Kaneko M, Hirano S. Voice rest after laryngeal surgery: what's the evidence? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;25:459-463.
    1. Emerich KA, Spiegel JR, Sataloff RT. Phonomicrosurgery III: pre- and postoperative care. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 2000;33:1071-1080.
    1. Hochman I, Sataloff RT, Hillman RE, Zeitels SM. Ectasias and varices of the vocal fold: clearing the striking zone. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:10-16.
    1. Dailey SH, Ford CN. Surgical management of sulcus vocalis and vocal fold scarring. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 2006;39:23-42.
    1. Ishikawa K, Thibeault S. Voice rest versus exercise: a review of the literature. J Voice 2010;24:379-387.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources