Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;17(6):1725-1750.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01181-4. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review

Affiliations

The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review

Rachelle Brick et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize delivery features and explore effectiveness of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions that address disability in adult cancer survivors.

Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library: Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, National Health Service's Health Technology Assessment, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) was conducted in December 2019 and updated in April 2021.

Results: Searches identified 3,499 unique studies. Sixty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. There were 81 unique interventions across included studies. Interventions were primarily delivered post-treatment and lasted an average of 16.5 weeks (SD = 13.1). They were most frequently delivered using telephone calls (59%), administered delivered by nursing professionals (35%), and delivered in a one-on-one format (88%). Risk of bias of included studies was primarily moderate to high. Included studies captured 55 measures of disability. Only 54% of reported outcomes had data that allowed calculation of effect sizes ranging -3.58 to 15.66.

Conclusions: The analyses suggest small effects of telehealth-based cancer interventions on disability, though the heterogeneity seen in the measurement of disability makes it hard to draw firm conclusions. Further research using more diverse samples, common measures of disability, and pragmatic study designs is needed to advance telehealth in cancer rehabilitation.

Implications for cancer survivors: Telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions have the potential to increase access to care designed to reduce disability across the cancer care continuum.

Keywords: Cancer rehabilitation; Disability; Function; Intervention; Neoplasm; Telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Pergolotti and Covington, and Tiffany Kendig report personal fees from Select Medical, ReVital Cancer Rehab outside the submitted work. Julie K. Silver has participated in research funded by the Binational Scientific Foundation and is a venture partner for Third Culture Capital outside of the work submitted. Aneesha Virani receives salary for full-time employment at Northside Hospital for work outside of submitted work. Aneesha Virani reports participating in research funded by the American Speech & Hearing Foundation for work outside of this project. Grace Campbell reports funding from the National Institute of Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Kathleen D. Lyons reports participating in research funded by the National Cancer Institute for work outside of this project. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plots of most commonly reported functional outcome measures with available data increase font of each section of figure

References

    1. O’Young B, Gosney J, Ahn C. The concept and epidemiology of disability. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019;30(4):697–707. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2019.07.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neo J, Fettes L, Gao W, Higginson IJ, Maddocks M. Disability in activities of daily living among adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;61(Supplement C):94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.10.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alfano CM, Kent EE, Padgett LS, Grimes M, de Moor JS. Making cancer rehabilitation services work for cancer patients: recommendations for research and practice to improve employment outcomes. PM R. 2017;9(9, Supplement 2):S398–S406. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.06.019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Starmer HM. Factors influencing adherence to treatment for head and neck cancer. In: Doyle PC, editor. Clinical care and rehabilitation in head and neck cancer. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 413–22. 10.1007/978-3-030-04702-3_24.
    1. Chasen MR. Cancer nutrition and rehabilitation – its time has come! Curr Oncol. 2008;15(3):6. 10.3747/co.v15i3.244. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types