Delayed cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children-identifying barriers for targeted interventions
- PMID: 35219037
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111086
Delayed cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children-identifying barriers for targeted interventions
Abstract
Objectives: Age of cochlear implantation (CI) is an important predictor of language development in those with congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Despite universal newborn hearing screening initiatives and the known benefits of early CI, a subset of congenitally deaf children continue to be evaluated for cochlear implants later in childhood. This study aims to identify the barriers to early cochlear implantation in these children.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for all pediatric cochlear implants aged 3 years or older performed at a single academic institution between 2013 and 2017. Children implanted before the age three, those with a prior unilateral cochlear implant, and those with progressive or sudden hearing loss were excluded. Variables included newborn hearing screen results, age at hearing loss diagnosis, time of initiation and documented benefit of hearing aids, age of implantation, pre/post-implantation evaluation scores, and reason for delayed referral for cochlear implantation.
Results: Thirty-one patients were identified meeting these inclusion criteria. Twenty-one children were subject to UNBS in the U.S. Fourteen of those children failed their newborn hearing screening. Average age at implantation was 6.2 years. Four reasons were identified for increased age at cochlear implantation. Two categories represent delays related to (1) Amplification continually prescribed even though the range of hearing loss and speech development assessment suggests CI may have been more appropriate well before referral (N = 13) (2) Patients were not subject to newborn hearing screening and/or timely diagnosis of their hearing loss (N = 8). In other cases, patients were appropriately fit with hearing aids until evidence that they derived limited benefit and then referred for CI (N = 8). Lastly, in a few cases, records were indeterminate with regards to the timing and appropriate diagnosis of their hearing loss (N = 2).
Conclusion: Understanding the reasons for delayed cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children might allow the development of targeted interventions to improve outcomes. Specifically, those children who were not referred before age 3 despite use of amplification with limited benefit offer one potential target population for earlier CI.
Keywords: Barriers to care; Barriers to cochlear implantation; Delayed cochlear implantation; Early implantation; Universal newborn hearing screening.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Barriers to early pediatric cochlear implantation.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;77(11):1869-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.08.031. Epub 2013 Sep 5. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 24035734
-
Exploring factors that affect the age of cochlear implantation in children.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Sep;75(9):1082-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.05.018. Epub 2011 Jun 23. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011. PMID: 21703694
-
The impact of cochlear implantation on speech and language outcomes in children with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jan;152:110979. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110979. Epub 2021 Nov 17. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 34844163
-
Pediatric cochlear implantation: expanding applications and outcomes.Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013 Aug;60(4):841-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2013.04.008. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013. PMID: 23905823 Review.
-
Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation.Dev Psychobiol. 2005 Apr;46(3):252-61. doi: 10.1002/dev.20052. Dev Psychobiol. 2005. PMID: 15772969 Review.
Cited by
-
Theory of Mind Development in Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Individuals: A Systematic Review.Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 6;15(8):1065. doi: 10.3390/bs15081065. Behav Sci (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40867422 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical