A genome-wide analysis of 340 318 participants identifies four novel loci associated with the age of first spectacle wear
- PMID: 35220419
- PMCID: PMC9433727
- DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddac048
A genome-wide analysis of 340 318 participants identifies four novel loci associated with the age of first spectacle wear
Abstract
Refractive errors, particularly myopia, are the most common eye conditions, often leading to serious visual impairment. The age of onset is correlated with the severity of refractive error in adulthood observed in epidemiological and genetic studies and can be used as a proxy in refractive error genetic studies. To further elucidate genetic factors that influence refractive error, we analysed self-reported age of refractive error correction data from the UK Biobank European and perform genome-wide time-to-event analyses on the age of first spectacle wear (AFSW). Genome-wide proportional hazards ratio analyses were conducted in 340 318 European subjects. We subsequently assessed the similarities and differences in the genetic architectures of refractive error correction from different causes. All-cause AFSW was genetically strongly correlated (rg = -0.68) with spherical equivalent (the measured strength of spectacle lens required to correct the refractive error) and was used as a proxy for refractive error. Time-to-event analyses found genome-wide significant associations at 44 independent genomic loci, many of which (GJD2, LAMA2, etc.) were previously associated with refractive error. We also identified six novel regions associated with AFSW, the most significant of which was on chromosome 17q (P = 3.06 × 10-09 for rs55882072), replicating in an independent dataset. We found that genes associated with AFSW were significantly enriched for expression in central nervous system tissues and were involved in neurogenesis. This work demonstrates the merits of time-to-event study design in the genetic investigation of refractive error and contributes additional knowledge on its genetic risk factors in the general population.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Non-additive (dominance) effects of genetic variants associated with refractive error and myopia.Mol Genet Genomics. 2020 Jul;295(4):843-853. doi: 10.1007/s00438-020-01666-w. Epub 2020 Mar 29. Mol Genet Genomics. 2020. PMID: 32227305 Free PMC article.
-
Genome-wide meta-analyses of multiancestry cohorts identify multiple new susceptibility loci for refractive error and myopia.Nat Genet. 2013 Mar;45(3):314-8. doi: 10.1038/ng.2554. Epub 2013 Feb 10. Nat Genet. 2013. PMID: 23396134 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive replication of the relationship between myopia-related genes and refractive errors in a large Japanese cohort.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Oct 21;55(11):7343-54. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15105. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014. PMID: 25335978
-
Genome-wide association studies of refractive error and myopia, lessons learned, and implications for the future.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 29;55(5):3344-51. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14149. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014. PMID: 24876304 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Advances in genome-wide association study of myopia].Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Oct 11;52(10):794-800. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2016.10.019. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2016. PMID: 27760653 Review. Chinese.
References
-
- Steinmetz, J.D., Bourne, R.R.A., Briant, P.S., Flaxman, S.R., Taylor, H.R.B., Jonas, J.B., Abdoli, A.A., Abrha, W.A., Abualhasan, A., Abu-Gharbieh, E.G.et al. (2021) Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the right to sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob. Health, 9, e144–e160. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Morgan, I.G., French, A.N., Ashby, R.S., Guo, X., Ding, X., He, M. and Rose, K.A. (2018) The epidemics of myopia: aetiology and prevention. Prog. Retin. Eye Res., 62, 134–149. - PubMed
-
- Williams, K.M., Bertelsen, G., Cumberland, P., Wolfram, C., Verhoeven, V.J.M., Anastasopoulos, E., Buitendijk, G.H.S., Cougnard-Grégoire, A., Creuzot-Garcher, C., Erke, M.G.et al. (2015) Increasing prevalence of myopia in Europe and the impact of education. Ophthalmology, 122, 1489–1497. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Vitale, S., Sperduto, R.D. and Ferris, F.L., III (2009) Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-1972 and 1999-2004. Arch. Ophthalmol., 127, 1632–1639. - PubMed
-
- Mutti, D.O., Zadnik, K. and Adams, A.J. (1996) Myopia. The nature versus nurture debate goes on. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 37, 952–957. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous