Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;306(5):1503-1517.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06437-z. Epub 2022 Feb 27.

Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania

Affiliations

Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania

Bronius Žaliūnas et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to construct a reference range for the Lithuanian population for fetal biparietal diameter (BPD), occipitofrontal diameter (OFD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) and to compare them with the old local and current international reference values.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out in secondary referral centres Vilnius University Hospital Santariškių Klinikos Centro Affiliate in 2008-2009 and Vilnius Maternity Hospital in 2009-2014. The fetal biometry of 556 fetuses between 12 and 42 weeks gestation was performed. BPD, OFD, HC, AC and FL were measured. The data were collected and the analysis was performed using statistical programs MS Excel, SPSS and Matlab. Different regression models were fitted to calculate the mean and standard deviation at each gestational age for each parameter.

Results: The biometric measurements of HC, BPD, OFD as well as AC and FL were performed for 556 fetuses. The centile charts, tables and regression formulae of the biometric parameters were constructed. The comparison of the current charts with those of other two studies revealed no significant differences of HC centiles. AC values were similar to those presented in the international study INTERGROWTH-21 and significantly higher in comparison to the study for the Lithuanian population conducted by Ališauskas (1980). FL values, especially in late pregnancy, were significantly smaller in the INTERGROWTH-21 study compared to our charts; however, there were no significant differences of the 50th centile compared to the results from Ališauskas.

Conclusions: We have constructed and presented centile charts, tables and regression formulae for fetal biometry for the Lithuanian population and compared them with the results of two other studies. The significant differences between our centile charts and those from INTERGROWTH-21 imply the necessity to have local standards of fetal biometry, while the differences of our results from the older study in the same population show the importance of updating fetal biometry reference charts for every generation.

Keywords: Fetal growth charts; Fetal ultrasound biometry; Reference values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Hanson MA, Gluckman PD (2014) Early developmental conditioning of later health and disease: Physiology or pathophysiology? Physiol Rev 94:1027–1076 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Gardosi J (2004) Customized fetal growth standards: rationale and clinical application. Semin Perinatol 28:33–40 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Kiserud T, Benachi A, Hecher K, Perez RG, Carvalho J, Piaggio G, Platt LD (2018) The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218(2S):S619–S629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiserud T, Piaggio G, Carroli G, Widmer M, Carvalho J, Neerup Jensen L, Giordano D, Cecatti JG, Abdel Aleem H, Talegawkar SA et al (2017) The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: A multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight. PLoS Med 14:e1002220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002220 (Erratum in: PLoS Med. 2017 Mar 24;14 (3):e1002284. Erratum in: PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 20;14 (4):e1002301. Erratum in: PLoS Med. 2021 Jan 7;18(1):e1003526. PMID: 28118360; PMCID: PMC5261648) - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Women and Children’s Health: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008) Guidance Antenatal Care: Routine Care for the Healthy Pregnant Woman. RCOG Press, London

LinkOut - more resources