Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 28;17(1):3.
doi: 10.1186/s13010-022-00116-2.

The "One Health" approach in the face of Covid-19: how radical should it be?

Affiliations
Review

The "One Health" approach in the face of Covid-19: how radical should it be?

Vittorio A Sironi et al. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. .

Abstract

Background: The 2020-2021 coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic is just the latest epidemic event that requires us to rethink and change our understanding of health. Health should no longer be conceived only in relation to human beings, but in unitary terms, as a dimension that connects humans, animals, plants, and the environment (holistic view, One Health). In general, alterations occurring in this articulated chain of life trigger a domino effect.

Methodology: In this paper, we review the One Health paradigm in the light of the Covid-19 pandemic and distinguish two approaches within it that might be dubbed the Prudent one and the Radical one. Each approach is structured in three levels - epistemological, medical, and ethical.

Results: In this way, we show how we humans can better address the pandemic today and how, in the future, we can treat the whole living system better, by renouncing our anthropocentric perspective on health.

Conclusion: We hold that the Prudent approach can be very helpful, and we discuss the medical and ethical issues related to it. We also consider the Radical view and the epistemological turn it requires compared to the Prudent one.

Keywords: Antibiotic resistance; Bioethics; Environment; Holistic view.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they do not have competing interests

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gardiner SM, Thompson A. The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.
    1. Ott, K. (2020). Environmental ethics. In: T. Kirchhoff (ed.), Online Encyclopedia Philosophy of Nature, https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/oepn/article/view/71420.
    1. Deem SL, Lane-deGraaf KE, Rayhel EA. Introduction to One Health: An interdisciplinary Approach to Planetary Health. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
    1. OIE. One Health. https://www.oie.int/en/forthe-media/onehealth/. 2020
    1. American Veterinary Medical Association. 2008. "One Health: A New Professional Imperative", https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/resources/onehealth_final.pdf.