A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthesis Insertion in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
- PMID: 35221231
- DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2022.01.004
A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthesis Insertion in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
Abstract
Introduction: A penile prosthesis (PP) may be inserted for erectile dysfunction (ED) and/or urinary management in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). This group of patients is considered high risk for complications due to their reduced mobility and sensation.
Objectives: To identify the complication and satisfaction rates following PP insertion in patients with SCI.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA checklist. The Medline/PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to July 27th 2021. Studies on men ≥18 years who had a PP inserted for ED secondary to SCI were included. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, assessed for risk of bias and performed data extraction.
Results: Eleven studies including 475 men with SCI were included for analysis. The overall complication rate was 4.2-61.1%. Specific complications included infection, 0-16%; erosion, 3.7-11.1% and mechanical failure, 0-16.7%. The explantation rate was 2.1-16.7% and the revision rate was 2.7-44.4%. Overall, 79.2-92.9% of men were satisfied with their PP and, 36-86.1% were having satisfactory sexual intercourse. In those who used the PP for urinary management ± ED, 86.5--92.8%% were satisfied. Men with SCI had higher rates of complications compared to those without SCI (infection, 2.1-9.1% vs non-SCI, 0.8-5.7%; erosion, 2.1-8.3% vs non-SCI, 0%; explanation, 2.1-8.3% vs non-SCI, 0.8-5.7%).
Conclusion: PP is an option for SCI patients for the management of end-stage ED or urinary function, but the rate of infection, erosion and implant explantation is higher compared with men without SCI. Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is the preferred PP due to the lower risk of erosion, however, they are prone to mechanical failure and require good hand dexterity. A thorough pre-operative counselling is essential. Pang KH, Muneer A, Alnajjar HM, et al. A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthesis Insertion in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:461-470.
Keywords: Erectile Dysfunction; IPP; Inflatable Penile Prosthesis; Malleable Penile Prosthesis; Neurogenic; Neurogenic Erectile Dysfunction; Penile Prosthesis; Spinal Cord Injury.
Copyright © 2022 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Trauma, and Genital and Urethral Reconstruction.J Urol. 2023 Feb;209(2):436-438. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003066. Epub 2022 Nov 17. J Urol. 2023. PMID: 36384275 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Penile Prosthesis Surgery: Current Recommendations From the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine.J Sex Med. 2016 Apr;13(4):489-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Mar 25. J Sex Med. 2016. PMID: 27045255
-
Penile Prosthesis Implantation Combined With Grafting Techniques in Patients With Peyronie's Disease and Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.Sex Med Rev. 2022 Jul;10(3):451-459. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Jul 1. Sex Med Rev. 2022. PMID: 34219005
-
Evaluation of patient satisfaction using the validated French version of the SSIPI questionnaire after inflatable penile implantation.J Sex Med. 2023 Dec 22;21(1):67-71. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad154. J Sex Med. 2023. PMID: 38014798
-
Outcomes related to penile prosthesis reservoir removal: a 7-year multi-institutional experience.J Sex Med. 2024 Oct 31;21(11):1076-1080. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae112. J Sex Med. 2024. PMID: 39271240
-
Synchronous Surgical Management of Erectile Dysfunction and Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reoperation Rates.Sex Med Rev. 2022 Oct;10(4):782-790. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Sep 26. Sex Med Rev. 2022. PMID: 36175310
Cited by
-
Nutritional aphrodisiacs: Biochemistry and Pharmacology.Curr Res Food Sci. 2024 Jun 11;9:100783. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100783. eCollection 2024. Curr Res Food Sci. 2024. PMID: 38974844 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Complications and troubleshooting in primary penile prosthetic surgery-a review.Int J Impot Res. 2023 Nov;35(7):679-685. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00699-0. Epub 2023 Apr 27. Int J Impot Res. 2023. PMID: 37106087 Review.
-
Penile prosthesis in the medically complex patient: a narrative review.Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Dec 31;12(12):1885-1892. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-71. Epub 2023 Dec 21. Transl Androl Urol. 2023. PMID: 38196703 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Technological advances in penile implants: past, present, future.Int J Impot Res. 2023 Nov;35(7):629-633. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00689-2. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Int J Impot Res. 2023. PMID: 36977850 Review.
-
Current devices, outcomes, and pain management considerations in penile implant surgery: an updated review of the literature.Asian J Androl. 2024 Jul 1;26(4):335-343. doi: 10.4103/aja202386. Epub 2024 Feb 20. Asian J Androl. 2024. PMID: 38376174 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous