Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan:106:102193.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102193. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

Associations of a National Tax on Non-Essential High Calorie Foods with Changes in Consumer Prices

Affiliations

Associations of a National Tax on Non-Essential High Calorie Foods with Changes in Consumer Prices

Tadeja Gračner et al. Food Policy. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Several governments are considering taxes on non-essential energy-dense, high calorie foods (NEDF) to increase their prices and thereby encourage better diet and health. Alongside a tax on sugary drinks in January 2014, Mexico implemented such a tax: an 8 percent ad-valorem tax on NEDF, defined as those with energy density equal or larger than 275kcal/100g. We study the changes in the prices of taxed and tax-exempt foods following this tax both on average and by tax-eligible foods across store types and cities, using monthly price data between 2012 and 2016. We compare within-product price changes before and after the tax adjusting for product fixed effects, seasonality, and trends, and find that prices of taxed foods increased by 4.8 % on average, but differentially across foods. Prices of candies, cookies and packaged pastries increased by eight or more percent post-tax (vs pre-tax); prices of cakes, and savory snacks increased by less. Prices of fresh pastry and ready-to-eat cereal increased, but only in 2014. Prices of chocolate and pizza did not increase after the tax. For tax-exempt foods, no significant price changes were observed. Variability in price changes for taxed foods were observed by cities as well as by stores: increases were larger in supermarkets compared to smaller grocery stores on average and for most foods. Differences in how prices changed across foods, cities and stores have implications for who is likely to be affected by the tax and how tax effects on diet may vary due to the differential tax pass-through in addition to a heterogenous demand response to changed prices.

Keywords: Mexico; energy-dense foods; prices; taxes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Changes in Real Prices of Taxed and Tax-Exempt Foods (2012–2016 vs 2013q4). Notes: Weighted monthly price for taxed and tax-exempt foods was calculated as the mean over a one-month period weighted by the 2010 budget share of the product category that each product for which price is observed belongs to; prices were expressed per kilogram, were log-transformed, de-trended and expressed relative to an average price in 2013q4. Prices were expressed in 2011 Mexican Pesos. Red vertical line marks tax implementation in December 2013.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Adjusted Changes in Real Prices of Taxed and Tax-Exempt Foods Relative to 2013q4. Notes: a) Quarterly changes in real prices of taxed and tax-exempt foods in % relative to 2013q4 were adjusted for time-invariant product characteristics, linear monthly trend, and product-category, city-level and point-of-sale specific trend. Outcome variable is a log-transformed real price per product in 2011 Mexican pesos. b) Nominal prices were deflated using the January 2011 CPI into real prices in Mexican Pesos, and were expressed per product per 1 kilogram (or liter) per month. c) The percent change in price was calculated by multiplying the estimate on post-tax quarterly indicator variable by 100. 95% confidence intervals were reported. Vertical red line marks the last quarter prior to the tax implementation (2013q4).
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Changes in Prices by Food Categories (2014–2016 vs 2012–2013). Note: a) Changes in real prices of taxed foods in % (2014–2016 vs 2012–2013) were adjusted for time-invariant product characteristics, linear monthly trend, seasonality, and product-category and city-level specific trend. Outcome variable is a log-transformed real price per product in 2011 Mexican pesos. b) Nominal prices were deflated using the January 2011 CPI into real prices in Mexican Pesos, and were expressed per product per 1 kilogram (or liter) per month. c) The percent change in price was calculated by multiplying the estimate on post-tax quarterly indicator variable by 100. d) 95% robust confidence intervals are reported. Ad-valorem NEDF tax marked at 8%.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Changes in Prices by Store Types. Note: 95% robust confidence intervals are reported. Solid and dashed line describes trajectories for prices collected in supermarkets and mini-markets, respectively. (A) Changes in real prices of taxed foods in % (2014–2016 vs 2012–2013) were adjusted for time-invariant product characteristics, linear monthly trend, seasonality, and point-of-sale, product-category and city-level specific trend. The percent change in price was calculated by multiplying the estimate on post-tax indicator variable by 100. Ad-valorem NEDF tax marked at 8%. (B) Quarterly changes in real prices of taxed foods in supermarkets and mini-markets or convenience stores in % relative to 2013q4 were adjusted for time-invariant product characteristics, and city-level and product category specific trend. The percent change in price was calculated by multiplying the estimate on post-tax quarterly indicator variable by 100. Vertical red line marks 2013q4.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
% Changes in Prices of Taxed Foods Across Cities (2014–2016 vs 2012–2013). Note: Changes in real prices of taxed foods in % (2014–2016 vs 2012–2013) were adjusted for time-invariant product characteristics, linear monthly trend, seasonality, and point-of-sale, product-category, and city-level specific trend. Three cities where prices decreased (Tepatitlan, Tehuantepec, Tapachula) are not presented here. The percent change in price was calculated by multiplying the estimate on post-tax indicator variable by 100. 95% robust confidence intervals are reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brownell KD, Farley T, Willett WC, et al. The Public Health and Economic Benefits of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;361(16):1599–1605. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colchero MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016;352:h6704. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cabrera Escobar MA, Veerman JL, Tollman SM, Bertram MY, Hofman KJ. Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1072. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pomeranz JL, Wilde P, Huang Y, Micha R, Mozaffarian D. Legal and administrative feasibility of a federal junk food and sugar-sweetened beverage tax to improve diet. American journal of public health. 2018;108(2):203–209. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kell E Food for thought: promoting healthy diets among children and young people. British Medical Association; 2015.

LinkOut - more resources