Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 16:2022:6781544.
doi: 10.1155/2022/6781544. eCollection 2022.

Single Incision Cholecystectomies for Acute Cholecystitis: A Single Surgeon Series from the Caribbean

Affiliations

Single Incision Cholecystectomies for Acute Cholecystitis: A Single Surgeon Series from the Caribbean

Shamir O Cawich et al. Minim Invasive Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is accepted as a safe alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopic (MPL) cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease. Since many surgeons carefully select patients without inflammation, there are limited data on SILS for acute cholecystitis. We report a single surgeon experience with SILS cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis.

Materials and methods: After securing ethical approval, we performed an audit of all SILS cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis by a single surgeon from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019. The following data were extracted: patient demographics, intraoperative details, surgical techniques, specialized equipment utilized, conversions (additional port placement), morbidity, and mortality. Data were analyzed using SPSS 12.0.

Results: SILS cholecystectomy was performed in 25 females at a mean age of 35 ± 4.1 (SD) years and a mean BMI of 31.9 ± 3.8 (SD) using a direct fascial puncture technique without access platforms. The operations were completed in 83 ± 29.4 minutes (mean ± SD) with an estimated blood loss of 76.9 ± 105 (mean + SD). Three (12%) patients required additional 5 mm port placement (conversions), but no open operations were performed. The patients were hospitalized for 1.96 ± 0.9 days (mean ± SD). There were 2 complications: postoperative superficial SSI (grade I) and a diaphragmatic laceration (grade III). No bile duct injuries were reported. There were 9 patients with complicated acute cholecystitis, and this sub-group had longer mean operating times (109.2 ± 27.3 minutes) and mean postoperative hospital stay (1.3 ± 0.87 days).

Conclusion: The SILS technique is a feasible and safe approach to perform cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. We advocate a low threshold to place additional ports to assist with difficult dissections for patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A comparison of the intraoperative views during SILS cholecystectomy in a patient without acute inflammation (a) and one with acute cholecystitis (b). The mural erythema and oedema in the patient with acute cholecystitis make grasping the gallbladder difficult and limit exposure of Calot's triangle (arrows).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Intraoperative views of structures in Calot's triangle during SILS cholecystectomy in a patient without inflammation and (b) one with acute cholecystitis. In (a), the cystic artery (red arrow), cystic duct (green arrow), and Rouviere's sulcus (white arrow) are visible across the thin, uninflamed peritoneum even before dissection, but the structures are not readily visible in the patient with acute cholecystitis.

References

    1. Navarra G., Pozza E., Occhionorelli S., Carcoforo P., Donini I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery . 1997;84(5):p. 695. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840536. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsimoyiannis E. C., Tsimogiannis K. E., Pappas-Gogos G., et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surgical Endoscopy . 2010;24(8):1842–1848. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bucher P., Pugin F., Buchs N. C., Ostermann S., Morel P. Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery . 2011;98(12):1695–1702. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7689. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asakuma M., Hayashi M., Komeda K., et al. Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain. British Journal of Surgery . 2011;98(7):991–995. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7486. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ma J., Cassera M. A., Spaun G. O., Hammill C. W., Hansen P. D., Aliabadi-Wahle S. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Annals of Surgery . 2011;254(1):22–27. doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182192f89. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources