Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;50(11):2274-2282.
doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i11.7583.

Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Influences Suicidal Ideation via Interpersonal Dependency and Anger

Affiliations

Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Influences Suicidal Ideation via Interpersonal Dependency and Anger

Jeongmin Ha et al. Iran J Public Health. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence is a serious global social problem. While intimate partner violence is highly prevalent, few studies have examined its negative outcomes among victims in South Korea. The aim was to clarify the mediating roles of interpersonal dependency and anger on the relationship between intimate partner violence victimization and suicidal ideation.

Methods: In this descriptive, cross-sectional study, 301 participants (203 women and 98 men) aged 18-65 yr completed an online questionnaire on a social networking site. Data were collected between Feb and Mar 2017 in South Korea. Structural equation modeling was used to test the fitness of the conceptual model of this study.

Results: We found significant correlations between intimate partner violence victimization, interpersonal dependency, state-trait anger, and suicidal ideation. Intimate partner violence victimization influenced anger and suicidal ideation only when the victims had high interpersonal dependency.

Conclusion: It is necessary to develop programs for reducing interpersonal dependency and improving anger management that are specifically targeted at intimate partner violence victims to prevent suicidal ideation.

Keywords: Interpersonal dependency; Mediating effect; State anger; Trait anger.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
Conceptual framework Note. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. García-Moreno C, Pallitto C, Devries K, Stöckl H, Watts C, Abrahams N. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence: World Health Organization; 2013. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/85239
    1. Renner LM, Whitney SD. (2012). Risk factors for unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among young adults. Child Abuse Negl, 36(1):40–52. - PubMed
    1. Costa D, Soares J, Lindert J, et al. (2015). Intimate partner violence: a study in men and women from six European countries. Int J Public Health, 60(4):467–78. - PubMed
    1. Khalifeh H, Hargreaves J, Howard LM, Birdthistle I. (2013). Intimate partner violence and socioeconomic deprivation in England: findings from a national cross-sectional survey. Am J Public Health, 103(3):462–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jonas S, Khalifeh H, Bebbington PE, McManus S, Brugha T, Meltzer H, Howard LM. (2014). Gender differences in intimate partner violence and psychiatric disorders in England: results from the 2007 adult psychiatric morbidity survey. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci, 23(2):189–99. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources