Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 11:9:790044.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.790044. eCollection 2022.

A Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury After Pericardiectomy: An Observational Study

Affiliations

A Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury After Pericardiectomy: An Observational Study

Jin Wang et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: Acute kidney injury is a common complication after pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis, which predisposes patients to worse outcomes and high medical costs. We aimed to investigate potential risk factors and consequences and establish a prediction model.

Methods: We selected patients with constrictive pericarditis receiving isolated pericardiectomy from January 2013 to January 2021. Patients receiving concomittant surgery or repeat percardiectomy, as well as end-stage of renal disease were excluded. Acute kidney injury was diagnosed and classified according to the KDIGO criteria. Clinical features were compared between patients with and without postoperative acute kidney injury. A prediction model was established based on multivariable regression analysis.

Results: Among two hundred and eleven patients, ninety-five (45.0%) developed postoperative acute kidney injury, with fourty-three (45.3%), twenty-eight (29.5%), and twenty-four (25.3%) in mild, moderate and severe stages, respectively. Twenty-nine (13.7%) patients received hemofiltration. Nine (4.3%) patients died perioperatively and were all in the acute kidney injury (9.5%) group. Eleven (5.2%) patients were considered to have chronic renal dysfunction states at the 6-month postoperative follow-up, and eight (72.7%) of them experienced moderate to severe stages of postoperative acute kidney injury. Univariable analysis showed that patients with acute kidney injury were older (difference 8 years, P < 0.001); had higher body mass index (difference 1.68 kg·m-2, P = 0.002); rates of smoking (OR = 2, P = 0.020), hypertension (OR = 2.83, P = 0.004), and renal dysfunction (OR = 3.58, P = 0.002); higher central venous pressure (difference 3 cm H2O, P < 0.001); and lower cardiac index (difference -0.23 L·min-1·m-2, P < 0.001) than patients without acute kidney injury. Multivariable regression analysis showed that advanced age (OR 1.03, P = 0.003), high body mass index (OR 1.10, P = 0.024), preoperative atrial arrhythmia (OR 3.12, P = 0.041), renal dysfunction (OR 2.70 P = 0.043), high central venous pressure (OR 1.12, P = 0.002), and low cardiac index (OR 0.36, P = 0.009) were associated with a high risk of postoperative acute kidney injury. A nomogram was established based on the regression results. The model showed good model fitness (Hosmer-Lemeshow test P = 0.881), with an area under the curve value of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.84, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The prediction model may help with early recognition, management, and reduction of acute kidney injury after pericardiectomy.

Keywords: KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes); acute kidney injury; constrictive pericarditis; nomogram; pericardiectomy; prediction model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Predictors of acute kidney injury after pericardiectomy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A nomogram of the prediction model for acute kidney injury after pericardiectomy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calibration plot of the prediction model.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver operator characteristic curve of the prediction model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, Badano L, Baron-Esquivias G, Bogaert J, et al. . 2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. (2015) 36:2921–64. 10.5603/KP.2015.0228 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin Y, Zhou M, Xiao J, Wang B, Wang Z. Treating constrictive pericarditis in a chinese single-center study: a five-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. (2012) 94:1235–40. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murashita T, Schaff HV, Daly RC, Oh JK, Dearani JA, Stulak JM, et al. . Experience with pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis over eight decades. Ann Thorac Surg. (2017) 104:742–50. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.063 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Busch C, Penov K, Amorim PA, Garbade J, Davierwala P, Schuler GC, et al. . Risk factors for mortality after pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis in a large single-centre cohort. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2015) 48:e110–6. 10.1093/ejcts/ezv322 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gillaspie EA, Stulak JM, Daly RC, Greason KL, Joyce LD, Oh J, et al. . A 20-year experience with isolated pericardiectomy: analysis of indications and outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2016) 152:448–58. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.098 - DOI - PubMed