Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 1;6(1):e10725.
doi: 10.1002/aet2.10725. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Going viral: A scoping review of the current state and impact of online research dissemination in emergency medicine

James M Gray  1 , David Schnadower  1   2 , Ryan LaFollette  3 , Ashish S Shah  4   5 , Brad Sobolewski  1   2
Affiliations

Going viral: A scoping review of the current state and impact of online research dissemination in emergency medicine

James M Gray et al. AEM Educ Train. .

Abstract

Background: The use of free open-access medical education (FOAM) and other online knowledge dissemination methods has increased over the past decade. However, the role and impact of these tools in the knowledge translation continuum are poorly understood, potentially limiting the ability of knowledge generators to fully harness and exploit their potential. Here, we aim to comprehensively map and synthesize the literature describing the use of online tools for the dissemination of emergency medicine research.

Methods: Using scoping review methodology, we searched the traditional literature via PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, SCOPUS, and the gray literature for publications exploring online methods to disseminate new research findings. We synthesized the results and constructed a conceptual model of current research dissemination methods.

Results: We included 79 out of 655 unique abstracts and articles identified in our search, 62 of which were from the traditional literature. We describe six primary domains: integration with traditional literature, measurement of dissemination, online organizations and communities of practice, professional development, quality assurance tools and techniques, and advantages and disadvantages of FOAM. For each domain we present an exemplar article and prevailing gaps in knowledge. Finally, we propose a current conceptual framework for dissemination of new research findings that describes both traditional and novel methods of dissemination.

Conclusions: This comprehensive review of the literature and current dissemination framework will empower researchers, research networks, and granting organizations to maximize their use of FOAM and other online methods to disseminate new knowledge as well as provide clinicians a better understanding of the tools and methods by which to access and implement new research findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of included studies
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Six major domains related to the use of novel methods to disseminate new research and key articles. FOAM, free open‐access medical education
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
A conceptual model for the dissemination of new knowledge and research and is integration with current practices. FOAM, free open‐access medical education
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Statistical Reports on MEDLINE®/PubMed® Baseline Data. 2019. Accessed September 9, 2019. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/licensee/baselinestats.html
    1. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510‐520. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diner BM, Carpenter CR, O'Connell T, et al. Graduate medical education and knowledge translation: role models, information pipelines, and practice change thresholds. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(11):1008‐1014. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.07.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lang ES, Wyer PC, Haynes RB. Knowledge translation: closing the evidence‐to‐practice gap. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(3):355‐363. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graham ID, Stiell IG, Laupacis A, et al. Awareness and use of the Ottawa Ankle and Knee Rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice? Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(3):259‐266. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.113506 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types