Comparison of ICSI and conventional IVF in non-male factor patients with less than four oocytes
- PMID: 35224650
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06471-x
Comparison of ICSI and conventional IVF in non-male factor patients with less than four oocytes
Abstract
Background: We aimed to analyse our clinical results for a particular subgroup of patients with poor ovarian response (POR) to clarify if lower number of oocytes is a drawback for proceeding to C-IVF.
Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, patient files of all couples (#1733) who underwent oocyte retrieval between January 2017 and December 2019 were reviewed and 191 cases diagnosed with non-male factor infertility in which ≤ 3 cumulus-oocyte complexes available for fertilisation were analysed. Exclusion criteria were: woman age > 42, patients with a history of previous ART trial, prenatal genetic testing cycles and couples undergoing total cryopreservation for any indication. Three groups were constructed depending on the method of fertilisation and on semen quality as follows: IVF non-male factor (Group 1, n = 77); ICSI non-male factor (Group 2, n = 65); ICSI male factor-ICSI/MF n = 49 according to WHO reference values. Main outcome parameters were: fertilisation rate, implantation rate and live birth rate.
Results: Fertilisation rate per collected COC was significantly higher in group 1 compared to the other two groups (85.68%, 72.58%, 73.33% respectively, p = 0.004). FR per inseminated oocyte also tended to be higher in group 1 but not reaching a statistically significant level. Both techniques yielded similar implantation rates (20.42%, 28.49%, 23.33% respectively, p = 0.407) and live birth rates (26.8%, 30.6%, 31.1%, respectively, p = 0.643).
Conclusion: In the presence of normal semen parameters, low egg number is not an indication to perform ICSI. The choice of fertilisation method should be based primarily on semen quality, in combination with the patient's previous history regardless of the ovarian reserve.
Keywords: Clinical pregnancy rate; ICSI; IVF; Implantation rate; Poor ovarian reserve.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Steptoe PC and Edwards RG (1978) Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 12;2(8085):366. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92957-4 .
-
- Niederberger C, Pellicer A, Cohen J, Gardner DK, Palermo GD, O'Neill CL, Chow S, Rosenwaks Z, Cobo A, Swain JE, Schoolcraft WB, Frydman R, Bishop LA, Aharon D, Gordon C, New E, Decherney A, Tan SL, Paulson RJ, Goldfarb JM, Brännström M, Donnez J, Silber S, Dolmans MM, Simpson JL, Handyside AH, Munné S, Eguizabal C, Montserrat N, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Trounson A, Simon C, Tulandi T, Giudice LC, Norman RJ, Hsueh AJ, Sun Y, Laufer N, Kochman R, Eldar-Geva T, Lunenfeld B, Ezcurra D, D'Hooghe T, Fauser BCJM, Tarlatzis BC, Meldrum DR, Casper RF, Fatemi HM, Devroey P, Galliano D, Wikland M, Sigman M, Schoor RA, Goldstein M, Lipshultz LI, Schlegel PN, Hussein A, Oates RD, Brannigan RE, Ross HE, Pennings G, Klock SC, Brown S, Van Steirteghem A, Rebar RW and LaBarbera AR (2018) Forty Years of IVF. Fertil Steril 15;110(2):185–324.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005 .
-
- Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC (1992) Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 340(8810):17–18 - DOI
-
- ESHRE Focus on Reproduction September 2016 https://www.eshre.eu/Publications/Focus-on-Reproduction/Focus-in-2016
-
- Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ (2015) Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA 313(3):255–263. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.17985 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources