Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;9(3):1757-1765.
doi: 10.1002/nop2.1202. Epub 2022 Feb 27.

Development and psychometric evaluation of self-management scale for pregnant woman with gestational diabetes mellitus in China

Guofang Kuang  1 , Xin Meng  1 , Yiqian Wang  1 , Ru Xu  1 , Meng Zhang  1
Affiliations

Development and psychometric evaluation of self-management scale for pregnant woman with gestational diabetes mellitus in China

Guofang Kuang et al. Nurs Open. 2022 May.

Abstract

Aim: To develop a self-management scale and evaluate its validity for pregnant woman with GDM in China.

Design: A cross-sectional survey design.

Methods: This study was conducted through three phases. The item pools of the scale were developed through literature review and expert interview. Content validity was assessed by an expert panel. Structure validity was evaluated through exploratory factor analysis. In the end, internal consistency reliability was tested.

Results: The self-management scale includes four dimensions, including self-management consciousness, pregnancy management, blood glucose management and resource utilization, with a total of 35 items. In the scale, the Cronbach's α was 0.95. The split-half reliability of the overall scale is 0.79. And the test-retest reliability was 0.91. The content validity was 0.94.

Conclusions: The scale is significantly valid and reliable, and it can be used to evaluate the self-management ability of pregnant woman with GDM in China.

Keywords: gestational diabetes mellitus; obstetrical nursing; pregnant woman; reliability; self-management scale; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Prisma flow diagram for searching literature and identifying initial items of self‐management scale
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barlow, J. , Wright, C. , Sheasby, J. , Turner, A. , & Hainsworth, J. (2002). Self‐management approaches for people with chronic conditions: A review. Patient Education & Counseling, 48(2), 177–187. 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00032-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carolan‐Olah, M. C . (2016). Educational and intervention programmes for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management: An integrative review. Collegian, 23, 103–114. 10.1016/j.colegn.2015.01.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carolan‐Olah, M. , Steele, C. , & Krenzin, G. (2015). Development and initial testing of a GDM information website for multi‐ethnic women with GDM. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15, 145–153. 10.1186/s12884-015-0578-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conway, A. , Chang, K. , Kamboj, N. , & Sutherland, J. (2021). Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale. Nursing Open, 8, 1135–1144. 10.1002/nop2.725 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Denise, P. (2012). Nursing research generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources