Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 9;6(1):12.
doi: 10.3390/vision6010012.

PreserFlo® MicroShunt: An Overview of This Minimally Invasive Device for Open-Angle Glaucoma

Affiliations
Review

PreserFlo® MicroShunt: An Overview of This Minimally Invasive Device for Open-Angle Glaucoma

Gloria Gambini et al. Vision (Basel). .

Abstract

For moderate-to-severe glaucoma, trabeculectomy remains the "gold standard" intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering treatment; nonetheless, this method requires extensive post-operative maintenance. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) treatments are designed to lessen intra- and post-operative care burden while offering an acceptable IOP decrease for individuals with mild to moderate glaucoma. The PreserFlo® MicroShunt (previously InnFocus MicroShunt) is an 8.5 mm glaucoma drainage device manufactured from poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) (SIBS), an extremely biocompatible and bioinert material. The lumen is narrow enough to prevent hypotony, but big enough to avoid being obstructed by sloughed cells or pigment. The device is implanted ab externo, as a stand-alone procedure or in conjunction with cataract surgery, with intraoperative mitomycin C, and a bleb is produced under the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule. The MicroShunt was CE-marked in 2012 and designed for primary open-angle glaucoma, the IOP of which remains uncontrolled after maximally tolerated topical treatment. Several clinical trials evaluating the MicroShunt's long-term safety and effectiveness have been conducted, highlighting the effectiveness of the device over time, along with a tolerable safety profile. The present review aims to gather evidence of PreserFlo's effectiveness and safety results almost 10 years after its introduction, and furthermore, to compare it with other MIGS and with the gold-standard trabeculectomy for glaucoma management.

Keywords: InnFocus MicroShunt; MicroShunt; PreserFlo; PreserFlo MicroShunt; SIBS polymer; XEN Gel Stent; glaucoma; glaucoma drainage devices; micro-invasive glaucoma surgery; mitomycin C.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simplified chemical structure of SIBS. M = number of isobutylene units; N = number of styrene units; SIBS = poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Anterior segment—optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) showing successfully implanted PreserFlo MicroShunt, piercing the trabecular meshwork and positioned bevel up in the anterior chamber.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PreserFlo MicroShunt the day after surgical implant. Pretty visible tube in the anterior chamber, sutures over the conjunctiva and the forming filtering bleb.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weinreb R.N., Aung T., Medeiros F.A. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: A review. JAMA. 2014;311:1901–1911. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3192. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jonas J., Aung T., Bourne R., Bron A., Ritch R., Panda-Jonas S. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2017;390:31461–31469. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31469-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gedde S.J., Feuer W.J., Shi W., Lim K.S., Barton K., Goyal S., Ahmed I.I.K., Brandt J., Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study G. Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:650–663. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gedde S.J., Schiffman J.C., Feuer W.J., Herndon L.W., Brandt J.D., Budenz D.L., Tube versus Trabeculectomy Study G. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012;153:789–803.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.026. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gedde S.J., Herndon L.W., Brandt J.D., Budenz D.L., Feuer W.J., Schiffman J.C., Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study G. Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012;153:804–814.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources