Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1978 Apr;13(4):669-75.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.13.4.669.

Use of a heavy inoculum in the in vitro evaluation of the anti-staphylococcal activity of 19 cephalosporins

Use of a heavy inoculum in the in vitro evaluation of the anti-staphylococcal activity of 19 cephalosporins

M Laverdiere et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Apr.

Abstract

The in vitro activity of 19 cephalosporins against 105 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis was determined by using a heavy inoculum, i.e., 10(8) to 10(9) organisms per ml, to maximally challenge the antibiotics. The anti-staphylococcal activities of cephaloridine and 87/312 were consistently decreased by the use of a heavy inoculum when compared with the activity obtained with two less-concentrated inocula. The activity of most of the other compounds was also decreased with the use of a heavy inoculum, but this was observed only with selected isolates. Cephapirin, cephalothin, and cefazaflur were the most active drugs against the methicillin-susceptible isolates. Cephaloridine, cefamandole, cefazaflur, and 87/312 had substantial activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci even with heavy inocula. With the exception of cefaclor against S. aureus, the orally absorbed cephalosporins were generally one-half to one-sixteenth as active as the parenterally administered cephalosporins. The median minimal inhibitory concentrations of five of the 12 parenteral cephalosporins were lower with the methicillin-susceptible S. aureus than with the methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis strains.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biochem J. 1965 Mar;94:584-93 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Sep;10(3):426-35 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Sep;10(3):507-10 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Apr;1(4):283-8 - PubMed
    1. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1976 Feb;29(2):181-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources