Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr;41(4):921-928.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03947-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

MRI as a screening tool for prostate cancer: current evidence and future challenges

Affiliations
Review

MRI as a screening tool for prostate cancer: current evidence and future challenges

Christoph Würnschimmel et al. World J Urol. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Prostate cancer (PCa) screening, which relies on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, is a contentious topic that received negative attention due to the low sensitivity and specificity of PSA to detect clinically significant PCa. In this context, due to the higher sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), several trials investigate the feasibility of "MRI-only" screening approaches, and question if PSA testing may be replaced within prostate cancer screening programs.

Methods: This narrative review discusses the current literature and the outlook on the potential of MRI-based PCa screening.

Results: Several prospective randomized population-based trials are ongoing. Preliminary study results appear to favor the "MRI-only" approach. However, MRI-based PCa screening programs face a variety of obstacles that have yet to be fully addressed. These include the increased cost of MRI, lack of broad availability, differences in MRI acquisition and interpretation protocols, and lack of long-term impact on cancer-specific mortality. Partly, these issues are being addressed by shorter and simpler MRI approaches (5-20 min bi-parametric MRI), novel quality indicators (PI-QUAL) and the implementation of radiomics (deep learning, machine learning).

Conclusion: Although promising preliminary results were reported, MRI-based PCa screening still lack long-term data on crucial endpoints such as the impact of MRI screening on mortality. Furthermore, the issues of availability, cost-effectiveness, and differences in MRI acquisition and interpretation still need to be addressed.

Keywords: MRI; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostagram; Prostate cancer screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Our research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, Dodds KM, Coplen DE, Yuan JJJ, et al. Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1156–1161. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199104253241702. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ilic D, Djulbegovic M, Jung JH, Hwang EC, Zhou Q, Cleves A, et al. Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018 doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3519. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loeb S, Bjurlin MA, Nicholson J, Tammela TL, Penson DF, Carter HB, et al. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;65:1046–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.062. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:120. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, Bibbins-Domingo K, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for prostate cancer. JAMA. 2018;319:1901. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710. - DOI - PubMed

Substances