Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;23(1):1-10.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-022-01084-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy in Interpreting mpMRI of the Prostate: a Systematic Review

Arvind Annamalai  1 , Judy N Fustok  1 , Jesus Beltran-Perez  2 , Ahmed T Rashad  2 , Louis S Krane  3 , Benjamin L Triche  4
Affiliations

Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy in Interpreting mpMRI of the Prostate: a Systematic Review

Arvind Annamalai et al. Curr Urol Rep. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To present the latest evidence related to interobserver agreement and accuracy; evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, and implications of use; and outline opportunities for improvement and future development of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).

Recent findings: Our review of currently available evidence suggests that recent improvements to the PI-RADS system with PI-RADS v2.1 slightly improved interobserver agreement, with generally high sensitivity and moderate specificity for the detection of clinically significant PCa. Recent evidence additionally demonstrates substantial improvement in diagnostic specificity with PI-RADS v2.1 compared with PI-RADS v2. However, results of studies examining the comparative performance of v2.1 are limited by small sample sizes and retrospective cohorts, potentially introducing selection bias. Some studies suggest a substantial improvement between v2.1 and v2, while others report no statistically significant difference. Additionally, in PI-RADS v2.1, the interpretation and reporting of certain findings remain subjective, particularly for category 2 lesions, and reader experience continues to vary significantly. These factors further contribute to a remaining degree of interobserver variability and findings of improved performance among more experienced readers. PI-RADS v2.1 appears to show at least minimal improvement in interobserver agreement, diagnostic performance, and both sensitivity and specificity, with greater improvements seen among more experienced readers. However, given the decrescent nature of these improvements and the limited power of all studies examined, the clinical impact of this progress may be marginal. Despite improvements in PI-RADS v2.1, practitioner experience in interpreting mpMRI of the prostate remains the most important factor in prostate cancer detection.

Keywords: Accuracy; Cancer; Imaging; Interobserver agreement; PI-RADS v2; PI-RADS v2.1; Prostate; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
    1. Rawla P. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J Oncol. 2019;10(2):63–89. - DOI
    1. Lomas DJ, Ahmed HU. All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(6):372–81. - DOI
    1. Zhang Y, et al. Development and internal validation of PI-RADs v2-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):102. - DOI
    1. •• Turkbey B, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019;76(3):340–51. This paper describes important changes to the PI-RADS system and details key improvements to the PI-RADS v2 framework within PI-RADS v2.1. - DOI
    1. Hassanzadeh E, et al. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2): a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42(1):278–89. - DOI

Publication types