Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 28;17(2):e0264433.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264433. eCollection 2022.

Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework

Florian Vogt  1   2 , Karishma Krishna Kurup  3 , Paul Mussleman  4 , Caroline Habrun  5 , Madeleine Crowe  6 , Alexandra Woodward  7 , Giovanna Jaramillo-Gutierrez  8 , John Kaldor  1 , Sirenda Vong  9 , Victor Del Rio Vilas  9
Affiliations

Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework

Florian Vogt et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Contact tracing is one of the key interventions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic but its implementation varies widely across countries. There is little guidance on how to monitor contact tracing performance, and no systematic overview of indicators to assess contact tracing systems or conceptual framework for such indicators exists to date.

Methods: We conducted a rapid scoping review using a systematic literature search strategy in the peer-reviewed and grey literature as well as open source online documents. We developed a conceptual framework to map indicators by type (input, process, output, outcome, impact) and thematic area (human resources, financial resources, case investigation, contact identification, contact testing, contact follow up, case isolation, contact quarantine, transmission chain interruption, incidence reduction).

Results: We identified a total of 153 contact tracing indicators from 1,555 peer-reviewed studies, 894 studies from grey literature sources, and 15 sources from internet searches. Two-thirds of indicators were process indicators (102; 67%), while 48 (31%) indicators were output indicators. Only three (2%) indicators were input indicators. Indicators covered seven out of ten conceptualized thematic areas, with more than half being related to either case investigation (37; 24%) or contact identification (44; 29%). There were no indicators for the input area "financial resources", the outcome area "transmission chain interruption", and the impact area "incidence reduction".

Conclusions: Almost all identified indicators were either process or output indicators focusing on case investigation, contact identification, case isolation or contact quarantine. We identified important gaps in input, outcome and impact indicators, which constrains evidence-based assessment of contact tracing systems. A universally agreed set of indicators is needed to allow for cross-system comparisons and to improve the performance of contact tracing systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram of literature identified, screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in this review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Case Investigation and Contact Tracing: Part of a Multipronged Approach to Fight the COVID-19 Pandemic. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/principles-contact-tracing.... Last updated 3 December 2020; accessed 29 April 2021.
    1. Girum T, Lentiro K, Geremew M, Migora B, Shewamare S. Global strategies and effectiveness for COVID-19 prevention through contact tracing, screening, quarantine, and isolation: a systematic review. Trop Med Health. 2020. Nov 23;48(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s41182-020-00285-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Contact tracing in the context of COVID-19 –Interim guidance. Available from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/339128/WHO-2019-nCoV-Co.... Last updated 1 February 2021; accessed 29 April 2021.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Contact Tracing. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/contact-tracing/index.html. Last updated 10 November 2020; accessed 29 April 2021.
    1. Habrun C, Hill S, Ortega E, Teigen J, Moses L. A comparative analysis of COVID-19 contact tracing guidance across WHO member states and regions. COVID-19 Knowledge Hub. Available from https://extranet.who.int/goarn/sites/default/files/A%20comparative%20ana.... Accessed 29 April 2021.

Publication types