Improving safety and outcomes in perioperative care: does implementation matter?
- PMID: 35227460
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.01.026
Improving safety and outcomes in perioperative care: does implementation matter?
Abstract
The IMPROVE study describes a large perioperative quality improvement project with reporting of both compliance with improvement activities and patient outcomes. It highlights the importance of such projects, as well as the challenges in implementing change and proving benefit. Challenges identified include the importance of effective training in practice change, selection of trial design and relevant quality measures, and how the context of quality improvement initiatives may influence outcomes. Quality improvement programmes of this nature, despite the difficulties with implementation and trial design, remain a high priority because of their positive influence on improving clinical practice.
Keywords: implementation science; outcomes; patient safety; performance; perioperative medicine; quality improvement; stepped-wedge trial design.
Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Increased adherence to perioperative safety guidelines associated with improved patient safety outcomes: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised multicentre trial.Br J Anaesth. 2022 Mar;128(3):562-573. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.019. Epub 2022 Jan 15. Br J Anaesth. 2022. PMID: 35039174 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources