Outcomes of modified chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus
- PMID: 35227590
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2022.02.013
Outcomes of modified chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to detect the effect of a modified chevron osteotomy on hallux valgus (HV) deformity at five-year follow up.
Methods: Twenty patients with symptomatic HV who underwent modified chevron osteotomy between June 2014 and January 2016 were included in the present study. The minimum follow-up duration was five years. Each patient was evaluated preoperatively, six weeks postoperatively and five years postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and cosmetic and radiological outcomes.
Results: The AOFAS score improved from 54.40 ( ± 4.58) preoperatively to 94.30 ( ± 2.15) six weeks postoperatively (p < 0.001) and 96.95 ( ± 1.54) five years postoperatively (p < 0.001). The VAS scores decreased from 6.30 ( ± 1.17) preoperatively to 0.15 ( ± 0.37) five years postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean intermetatarsal angle improved from 16.00° ( ± 2.20°) preoperatively to 4.15° ( ± 1.22°) six weeks postoperatively (p < 0.001) and 4.40° ( ± 1.39°) five years postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean HV angle also improved, from 32.70° ( ± 5.34°) preoperatively to 4.80° ( ± 1.40°) six weeks postoperatively (p < 0.001) and 5.20° ( ± 1.32°) five years postoperatively (p < 0.001). The cosmetic results were either excellent or good in 19 patients (95%). There was no recurrence in this study during the five postoperative years.
Conclusion: A modified chevron osteotomy can achieve successful correction of moderate-to-severe HV, with excellent outcomes at five-year follow up.
Keywords: AOFAS score; Chevron osteotomy; Clinical outcome; Follow up; Hallux valgus.
Copyright © 2022 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
