Effects of Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Benign Hysterectomy
- PMID: 35227913
- PMCID: PMC9284594
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.02.009
Effects of Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Benign Hysterectomy
Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate whether the addition of pharmacologic prophylaxis to mechanical prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with changes in perioperative outcomes in hysterectomy for benign indications.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database.
Patients: Patients who underwent hysterectomy between July 2012 and June 2015 when VTE prophylaxis data were collected.
Interventions: Patients who received mechanical prophylaxis alone were compared with those receiving dual prophylaxis (mechanical and pharmacologic). Minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) included laparoscopic, vaginal, robotic-assisted, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies and were analyzed separately from abdominal (ABD) hysterectomy.
Measurements and main results: Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding because of the differences in demographic and perioperative characteristics. The primary outcome was estimated blood loss (EBL). The secondary outcomes were operative time, postoperative blood transfusion, VTE, surgical site infection, reoperation, readmission, and death. There were 1803 matched pairs in the MIS analysis. In the ABD hysterectomy analysis, 2:1 matching was used with a total of 1168 patients receiving mechanical prophylaxis alone matched to 616 patients receiving dual prophylaxis. EBL was higher by 54.5 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9-92.1) in those receiving dual prophylaxis in the ABD hysterectomy analysis but did not differ between groups in the MIS analysis. Operative time was significantly longer with dual prophylaxis in both MIS (18.3 minutes; 95% CI, 13.8-22.8) and ABD (15.3 minutes; 95% CI, 9.0-21.6) surgical approaches. There was no difference in other secondary outcomes.
Conclusion: The addition of pharmacologic prophylaxis to mechanical prophylaxis in benign hysterectomy was associated with longer operative time, regardless of surgical approach and increased EBL in ABD hysterectomy. Given very low rates of VTE, no difference in other perioperative outcomes, and possible harm, it seems reasonable to encourage individualized rather than routine use of pharmacologic prophylaxis in patients undergoing benign hysterectomy receiving mechanical prophylaxis.
Keywords: Anticoagulation; Perioperative care, Laparoscopic surgery.
Copyright © 2022 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations of interest: none
Figures
Similar articles
-
Venous Thromboembolism After Abdominal and Minimally Invasive Large Specimen Hysterectomy.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023 Nov;30(11):884-889. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.06.017. Epub 2023 Jul 6. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37422052
-
Incidence of venous thromboembolism after robotic-assisted hysterectomy in obese patients with endometrial cancer: do we need extended prophylaxis?J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):343-348. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01110-6. Epub 2020 Jun 26. J Robot Surg. 2021. PMID: 32592139
-
Effect of length of surgery on the incidence of venous thromboembolism after benign hysterectomy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):364.e1-364.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33039394
-
A meta-analysis and systematic review of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures.J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Sep;8(5):869-881.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Apr 21. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020. PMID: 32330639
-
Complications of hysterectomy.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;121(3):654-673. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182841594. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23635631 Review.
Cited by
-
Racial disparities in extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hysterectomy.PLoS One. 2025 Jan 28;20(1):e0318433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318433. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39874351 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Walsh JJ, Bonnar J, Wright FW. A study of pulmonary embolism and deep leg vein thrombosis after major gynaecological surgery using labelled fibrinogen-phlebography and lung scanning. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1974;81(4):311–316. - PubMed
-
- Jorgensen EM, Li A, Modest AM, Leung K, Moore Simas TA, Hur HC. Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism After Different Modes of Gynecologic Surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018. Nov;132(5):1275–1284. - PubMed
-
- Brummer TH, Heikkinen A, Jalkanen J, Fraser J, Mäkinen J, Tomás E, et al. Pharmaceutical thrombosis prophylaxis, bleeding complications and thromboembolism in a national cohort of hysterectomy for benign disease. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1628–36. - PubMed
-
- Kahr HS, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Christiansen OB, Skals RK, Torp-Pedersen C, Knudsen A. Venous Thromboembolic Complications to Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018. May – Jun;25(4):715–723.e2. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources