Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 22;2(1):e31259.
doi: 10.2196/31259. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.

Understanding the #longCOVID and #longhaulers Conversation on Twitter: Multimethod Study

Sara Santarossa  1 , Ashley Rapp  1 , Saily Sardinas  1 , Janine Hussein  1 , Alex Ramirez  1   2 , Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow  1 , Philip Cheng  3 , Eunice Yu  4
Affiliations

Understanding the #longCOVID and #longhaulers Conversation on Twitter: Multimethod Study

Sara Santarossa et al. JMIR Infodemiology. .

Abstract

Background: The scientific community is just beginning to uncover the potential long-term effects of COVID-19, and one way to start gathering information is by examining the present discourse on the topic. The conversation about long COVID-19 on Twitter provides insight into related public perception and personal experiences.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the #longCOVID and #longhaulers conversations on Twitter by examining the combined effects of topic discussion and social network analysis for discovery on long COVID-19.

Methods: A multipronged approach was used to analyze data (N=2500 records from Twitter) about long COVID-19 and from people experiencing long COVID-19. A text analysis was performed by both human coders and Netlytic, a cloud-based text and social networks analyzer. The social network analysis generated Name and Chain networks that showed connections and interactions between Twitter users.

Results: Among the 2010 tweets about long COVID-19 and 490 tweets by COVID-19 long haulers, 30,923 and 7817 unique words were found, respectively. For both conversation types, "#longcovid" and "covid" were the most frequently mentioned words; however, through visually inspecting the data, words relevant to having long COVID-19 (ie, symptoms, fatigue, pain) were more prominent in tweets by COVID-19 long haulers. When discussing long COVID-19, the most prominent frames were "support" (1090/1931, 56.45%) and "research" (435/1931, 22.53%). In COVID-19 long haulers conversations, "symptoms" (297/483, 61.5%) and "building a community" (152/483, 31.5%) were the most prominent frames. The social network analysis revealed that for both tweets about long COVID-19 and tweets by COVID-19 long haulers, networks are highly decentralized, fragmented, and loosely connected.

Conclusions: This study provides a glimpse into the ways long COVID-19 is framed by social network users. Understanding these perspectives may help generate future patient-centered research questions.

Keywords: COVID-19; PASC; Twitter; communication; experience; insight; long term; patient-centered; patient-centered care; perception; postacute sequela of COVID-19; social media; social network analysis; symptom.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Word cloud of tweets about long COVID-19 (left) and tweets by COVID-19 long haulers (right) based on number of instances from a one-time Netlytic data pull in February of 2021.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Name (left) and Chain (right) networks for tweets about long COVID-19 conversations on Twitter from a one-time Netlytic data pull in February of 2021, presented using a Dr L layout [30].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Name (left) and Chain (right) networks for tweets by COVID-19 long haulers based on conversations on Twitter from a one-time Netlytic data pull in February of 2021, presented using a Fruchterman-Reingold layout [31].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Huo J, Desai R, Hong Y, Turner K, Mainous AG, Bian J. Use of social media in health communication: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2013, 2014, and 2017. Cancer Control. 2019 Apr 18;26(1):1073274819841442. doi: 10.1177/1073274819841442. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073274819841442?url_ver=Z39.88... - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tankovska H. Global social networks ranked by number of users 2021. Statista. [2022-02-16]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked...
    1. Santarossa S, Kane D, Senn CY, Woodruff SJ. Exploring the role of in-person components for online health behavior change interventions: can a digital person-to-person component suffice? J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 11;20(4):e144. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8480. https://www.jmir.org/2018/4/e144/ v20i4e144 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. González-Padilla DA, Tortolero-Blanco L. Social media influence in the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Jul;46(suppl.1):120–124. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.S121. https://www.intbrazjurol.com.br/pdf/vol46S1/IBJU2020S121.pdf IBJU2020S121 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGloin AF, Eslami S. Digital and social media opportunities for dietary behaviour change. Proc Nutr Soc. 2015 May;74(2):139–148. doi: 10.1017/S0029665114001505.S0029665114001505 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources