Understanding the #longCOVID and #longhaulers Conversation on Twitter: Multimethod Study
- PMID: 35229074
- PMCID: PMC8867393
- DOI: 10.2196/31259
Understanding the #longCOVID and #longhaulers Conversation on Twitter: Multimethod Study
Abstract
Background: The scientific community is just beginning to uncover the potential long-term effects of COVID-19, and one way to start gathering information is by examining the present discourse on the topic. The conversation about long COVID-19 on Twitter provides insight into related public perception and personal experiences.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the #longCOVID and #longhaulers conversations on Twitter by examining the combined effects of topic discussion and social network analysis for discovery on long COVID-19.
Methods: A multipronged approach was used to analyze data (N=2500 records from Twitter) about long COVID-19 and from people experiencing long COVID-19. A text analysis was performed by both human coders and Netlytic, a cloud-based text and social networks analyzer. The social network analysis generated Name and Chain networks that showed connections and interactions between Twitter users.
Results: Among the 2010 tweets about long COVID-19 and 490 tweets by COVID-19 long haulers, 30,923 and 7817 unique words were found, respectively. For both conversation types, "#longcovid" and "covid" were the most frequently mentioned words; however, through visually inspecting the data, words relevant to having long COVID-19 (ie, symptoms, fatigue, pain) were more prominent in tweets by COVID-19 long haulers. When discussing long COVID-19, the most prominent frames were "support" (1090/1931, 56.45%) and "research" (435/1931, 22.53%). In COVID-19 long haulers conversations, "symptoms" (297/483, 61.5%) and "building a community" (152/483, 31.5%) were the most prominent frames. The social network analysis revealed that for both tweets about long COVID-19 and tweets by COVID-19 long haulers, networks are highly decentralized, fragmented, and loosely connected.
Conclusions: This study provides a glimpse into the ways long COVID-19 is framed by social network users. Understanding these perspectives may help generate future patient-centered research questions.
Keywords: COVID-19; PASC; Twitter; communication; experience; insight; long term; patient-centered; patient-centered care; perception; postacute sequela of COVID-19; social media; social network analysis; symptom.
©Sara Santarossa, Ashley Rapp, Saily Sardinas, Janine Hussein, Alex Ramirez, Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow, Philip Cheng, Eunice Yu. Originally published in JMIR Infodemiology (https://infodemiology.jmir.org), 22.02.2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Huo J, Desai R, Hong Y, Turner K, Mainous AG, Bian J. Use of social media in health communication: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2013, 2014, and 2017. Cancer Control. 2019 Apr 18;26(1):1073274819841442. doi: 10.1177/1073274819841442. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073274819841442?url_ver=Z39.88... - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Tankovska H. Global social networks ranked by number of users 2021. Statista. [2022-02-16]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked...
-
- Santarossa S, Kane D, Senn CY, Woodruff SJ. Exploring the role of in-person components for online health behavior change interventions: can a digital person-to-person component suffice? J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 11;20(4):e144. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8480. https://www.jmir.org/2018/4/e144/ v20i4e144 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- González-Padilla DA, Tortolero-Blanco L. Social media influence in the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Jul;46(suppl.1):120–124. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.S121. https://www.intbrazjurol.com.br/pdf/vol46S1/IBJU2020S121.pdf IBJU2020S121 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
