Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Mar 15;11(6):e023526.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023526. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

Structured Lifestyle Modification Interventions Involving Frontline Health Workers for Population-Level Blood Pressure Reduction: Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India (DISHA Study)

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Structured Lifestyle Modification Interventions Involving Frontline Health Workers for Population-Level Blood Pressure Reduction: Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India (DISHA Study)

Dimple Kondal et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Population-wide reduction in mean blood pressure is proposed as a key strategy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. We evaluated the effectiveness of a task-sharing strategy involving frontline health workers in the primary prevention of elevated blood pressure. Methods and Results We conducted DISHA (Diet and lifestyle Interventions for Hypertension Risk reduction through Anganwadi Workers and Accredited Social Health Activists) study, a cluster randomized controlled trial involving 12 villages each from 4 states in India. Frontline health workers delivered a custom-made and structured lifestyle modification intervention in the selected villages. A baseline survey was conducted in 23 and 24 clusters in the control (n=6663) and intervention (n=7150) groups, respectively. The baseline characteristics were similar between control and intervention clusters. In total 5616 participants from 23 clusters in the control area and 5699 participants from 24 clusters in the intervention area participated in a repeat cross-sectional survey conducted immediately after the intervention phase of 18-months. The mean (SD) systolic blood pressure increased from 125.7 (18.1) mm Hg to 126.1 (16.8) mm Hg in the control clusters, and it increased from 124.4 (17.8) mm Hg to 126.7 (17.5) mm Hg in the intervention clusters. The population average adjusted mean difference in difference in systolic blood pressure was 1.75 mm Hg (95% CI, -0.21 to 3.70). Conclusions Task-sharing interventions involving minimally trained nonphysician health workers are not effective in reducing population average blood pressure in India. Expanding the scope of task sharing and intensive training of health workers such as nurses, nutritionists, or health counselors in management of cardiovascular risk at the population level may be more effective in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Registration URL: https://www.ctri.nic.in; Unique identifier: CTRI/2013/10/004049.

Keywords: India; cardiovascular disease; high blood pressure; hypertension; systolic blood pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Randomization, intervention, and follow‐up.
DBP indicates diastolic blood pressure; and SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of systolic and diastolic blood pressure at baseline and post intervention (mm Hg).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Adjusted mean values (95% CI) by control and intervention group at baseline and post intervention for systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg).
Adjusted‐GEE analysis with an exchangeable covariance matrix, to account for clustering of participants within clusters/villages and model is adjusted for baseline cluster mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure, age, sex, education, and season and duration of intervention. DBP indicates diastolic blood pressure; GEE, generalized estimating equation; and SBP, systolic blood pressure.

References

    1. Roth GA, Johnson C, Abajobir A, Abd‐Allah F, Abera SF, Abyu G, Ahmed M, Aksut B, Alam T, Alam K, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.052 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Roy A. Cardiovascular diseases in India: current epidemiology and future directions. Circulation. 2016;133:1605–1620. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008729 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gakidou E, Afshin A, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd‐Allah F, Abdulle AM, Abera SF, Aboyans V, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1345–1422. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, Ng M, Biryukov S, Marczak L, Alexander L, Estep K, Hassen Abate K, Akinyemiju TF, et al. Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115 mm hg, 1990–2015. JAMA. 2017;317:165–182. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19043 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roy A, Praveen PA, Amarchand R, Ramakrishnan L, Gupta R, Kondal D, Singh K, Sharma M, Shukla DK, Tandon N, et al. Changes in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control rates over 20 years in national capital region of India: results from a repeat cross‐sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015639. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015639 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types