Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;31(7):983-990.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0343. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

Women's Understandings and Misunderstandings of Breast Density and Related Concepts: A Mixed Methods Study

Affiliations

Women's Understandings and Misunderstandings of Breast Density and Related Concepts: A Mixed Methods Study

Nancy R Kressin et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Most U.S. states require written notification of breast density after mammograms, yet effects of notifications on knowledge are mixed. Little is known about potential misunderstandings. Methods: We used a sequential mixed-methods study design to assess women's knowledge about breast density, after receiving a notification. We conducted a telephone survey among a racially/ethnically and health-literacy level diverse sample (N = 754) and qualitative interviews with 61 survey respondents. Results: In survey results, 58% of women correctly indicated that breast density is not related to touch, with higher accuracy among non-Hispanic White women and those with greater health literacy. Next, 87% of women recognized that breast density is identified visually via mammogram, with no significant differences in responses by race/ethnicity or health literacy. Most (81%) women recognized that a relationship exists between breast tissue types and density; Non-Hispanic White women were less likely to respond correctly. Only 47% of women correctly indicated that having dense breasts increases one's risk of breast cancer; women with low health literacy were more often correct. Qualitative results revealed additional dimensions of understanding: Some women incorrectly reported that density could be felt, or dense breasts were lumpier, thicker, or more compacted; others identified "dense" tissue as fatty. Interpretations of risk included that breast density was an early form of breast cancer. Conclusion: We found areas of consistent knowledge and identified misperceptions surrounding breast density across race/ethnicity and health literacy levels. Further education to address disparities and correct misunderstandings is essential to promote better knowledge, to foster informed decisions.

Keywords: breast density; dense breast notifications; mammography; patient health beliefs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

P.J.S., Co-author on an UpToDate article on Breast density and screening for breast cancer, for which she receives royalties. No competing financial interests exist for the other authors.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Screening and recruitment.

References

    1. Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. . Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: A cohort study. Ann Internal Med 2011;155:493–502. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A, et al. . Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Internal Med 2012;156:635–648. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DenseBreast-Info.org. DenseBreast-Info.org. 2021. Available at https://densebreast-info.org Accessed June 22, 2021.
    1. Pace LE. Dense breast notification legislation: More reasons for caution. J Gen Internal Med 2020;35:1937–1939. - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Mammography Quality Standards Act. 2019. Available at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/03/28/2019-05803/mammogra... Accessed July 27, 2020.

Publication types