Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Jun;33(6):1617-1631.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05120-w. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

Biomechanical integrity score of the female pelvic floor

Affiliations
Observational Study

Biomechanical integrity score of the female pelvic floor

Vladimir Egorov et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of this study is to develop and validate a new integral parameter, the Biomechanical Integrity score (BI-score), for the characterization of the female pelvic floor.

Methods: A total of 253 subjects with normal and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) conditions were included in the multi-site observational, case-control study; 125 subjects had normal pelvic floor conditions, and 128 subjects had POP stage II or higher. A Vaginal Tactile Imager (VTI) was used to acquire and automatically calculate 52 biomechanical parameters for eight VTI test procedures (probe insertion, elevation, rotation, Valsalva maneuver, voluntary muscle contractions in two planes, relaxation, and reflex contraction). Statistical methods were applied (t-test, correlation) to identify the VTI parameters sensitive to the pelvic conditions.

Results: Twenty-six parameters were identified as statistically sensitive to POP development. They were subdivided into five groups to characterize (1) tissue elasticity, (2) pelvic support, (3) pelvic muscle contraction, (4) involuntary muscle relaxation, and (5) pelvic muscle mobility. Every parameter was transformed to its standard deviation units against the patient age similar to T-score for bone density. Linear combinations with specified weights led to the composition of five component parameters for groups (1)-(5) and the BI-score in standard deviation units. The p-value for the BI-score has p = 4.3 × 10-31 for POP versus normal conditions. A reference BI-score curve against age for normal pelvic floor conditions was defined.

Conclusions: Quantitative transformations of the pelvic tissues, support structures, and functions under diseased conditions may be studied with the BI-score in future research and practical applications.

Keywords: Biomechanical integrity score; Muscle mobility; Muscle relaxation; Pelvic muscle strength; Pelvic organ prolapse; Pelvic support; Tissue elasticity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Egorov is a CEO and a minor shareholder in Advanced Tactile Imaging, Inc. Egorov has submitted a patent application related to the reported approach. Raalte is a minor shareholder of Advanced Tactile Imaging, Inc. Takacs reports no conflict of interest. Shobeiri reports no conflict of interest. Lucente reports no conflict of interest. Hoyte reports no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Vaginal probe. Pressure sensors are aligned on the outer surfaces of the probe (highlighted in the image)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplots for 26 identified VTI parameters which demonstrate statistically significant sensitivity to POP conditions and not highly correlated with each other
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A diagram illustrating composition of BI-score from five components and VTI parameters contributing to these components with specific weights
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
BI-score calculated for normal (blue dots) and POP (red dots) cases against patient age for 253 cases analyzed in this study (left panel). BI-score boxplots for normal (blue dots) and POP (red dots) cases
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
An example of examination results with BI-score and its five components for a 58-year-old patient with stage 2 anterior prolapse

References

    1. The American College of Obstetricians (ACOG) and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Pelvic organ prolapse. Practice Bulletin Number 185. Female Pelvic Med Reconstruct Surg. 2017;23(6):353–64. - PubMed
    1. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–17. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70243-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Arruda GT, Dos Santos HT, Virtuoso JF. Pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI)-systematic review of measurement properties. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(10):2657–2669. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04748-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Okobi OE. A systemic review on the association between infertility and sexual dysfunction among women utilizing female sexual function index as a measuring tool. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e16006. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The American College of Obstetricians (ACOG) and gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Pelvic organ prolapse. Interim update. Female Pelvic Med Reconstruct Surg. 2019;25(6):397–408. - PubMed

Publication types