Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):223.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09261-5.

Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review

Affiliations

Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review

Ashley Kim et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Multi-cancer early detection tests have been developed to enable earlier detection of multiple cancer types through screening. As reflected by patient-reported outcomes (PROs), the psychosocial impact of cancer screening is not yet clear. Our aim is to evaluate the impact of cancer screening through PRO assessment.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists of articles from January 2000 to August 2020 for relevant publications assessing the psychosocial impact of cancer screening before and within 1 year after screening in the general asymptomatic population, including following receipt of results. Studies focused on diagnostic evaluation or involving patients previously diagnosed with cancer were excluded.

Results: In total, 31 studies (12 randomized controlled trials; 19 observational studies) were included, reflecting PRO assessments associated with lung, breast, colorectal, anal, ovarian, cervical, and prostate cancer screening procedures. The most commonly assessed construct was symptoms of anxiety, using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Cancer-specific distress and worry were also assessed using a broad range of measures. Overall, individuals tolerated screening procedures well with no major psychosocial effects. Of note, increases in symptoms of anxiety and levels of distress and worry were generally found prior to communication of screening results and following communication of indeterminate or positive results that required further testing. These negative psychosocial effects were, however, not long-lasting and returned to baseline relatively soon after screening. Furthermore, individuals with higher cancer risk, such as current smokers and those with a family history of cancer, tended to have higher levels of anxiety and distress throughout the screening process, including following negative or indeterminate results.

Conclusions: The psychosocial impact of cancer screening is relatively low overall and short-lived, even following false-positive test results. Individuals with a higher risk of cancer tend to experience more symptoms of anxiety and distress during the screening process; thus, more attention to this group is recommended.

Keywords: Cancer screening; Clinical trials; Patient-reported outcome measures; Patient-reported outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AK, KCC, CK are employees of GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc. DLP has a consulting/advisory role with GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Flow Diagram

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lancet T. Late-stage cancer detection in the USA is costing lives. Lancet. 2010;376:1873. - PubMed
    1. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, Cancer Trends Progress Report Website. https://progressreport.cancer.gov/diagnosis/stage#field_most_recent_esti.... Accessed 13 Aug 2021.
    1. NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: ovarian Cancer including fallopian tube Cancer and primary peritoneal Cancer, version 2. 2021. Accessed 13 Aug 2021.
    1. Pancreatic Cancer Action Network. Pancreatic Cancer Facts 2016. https://www.pancan.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2016-GAA-PC-Facts.pdf Accessed 13 Aug 2021.

Publication types