Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;33(9):2325-2334.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review

Maisie Ralphsmith  1 , Susannah Ahern  1 , Joanne Dean  1 , Rasa Ruseckaite  2
Affiliations

Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review

Maisie Ralphsmith et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helpful instruments when measuring and reporting changes in patient health status (Al Sayah et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes 5 (Suppl 2):99, 2021) such as the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) aims to increase capacity for women to report surgical outcomes through the collection of HrQoL data (Ruseckaite et al. Qual Life Res. 2021) but currently lacks a pain-specific PROM for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), particularly POP and SUI. This review aims to systematically review the existing literature and identify instruments that measure pain in women with POP and SUI for inclusion within the APFPR, which reports on complications from these conditions.

Methods: We conducted a literature search on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMCARE databases in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature to identify studies from inception to April 2021. Full-text studies were included if they used PROMs to measure pain in women with POP and SUI. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed methodological quality.

Results: From 2001 studies, 23 publications describing 19 different PROMs were included for analysis. Eight of these instruments were specific to the pelvic floor; four were only specific to pain and used across multiple disorders; three were generic quality of life instruments and four were other non-validated instruments such as focus group interviews. These instruments were not specific to pain in women with POP or SUI, as they did not identify all relevant domains such as the sensation, region and duration of pain, or incidents where onset of pain occurs.

Conclusions: The findings of this review suggest there are no current PROMs that are suitable pain-specific instruments for women with POP or SUI. This knowledge may inform and assist in the development of a new PROM to be implemented into the APFPR.

Keywords: Pain; Patient-reported outcome measures; Pelvic floor disorder; Public health; Registry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) flowchart showing selection of articles for review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2020. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/14459-pelvic-floor-dysfun.... Accessed 19 Apr 2021.
    1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN. An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. Bjog. 2000;107(12):1460–1470. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11669.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096–1100. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f73729. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daly JO, Ahern S, Herkes R, O'Connell HE. The Australasian pelvic floor procedure registry: not before time. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59(4):473–476. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13030. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types