Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 May 1;157(5):424-434.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0089.

Evaluation of Quality of Life After Nonoperative or Operative Management of Proximal Femoral Fractures in Frail Institutionalized Patients: The FRAIL-HIP Study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Evaluation of Quality of Life After Nonoperative or Operative Management of Proximal Femoral Fractures in Frail Institutionalized Patients: The FRAIL-HIP Study

Sverre A I Loggers et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Decision-making on management of proximal femoral fractures in frail patients with limited life expectancy is challenging, but surgical overtreatment needs to be prevented. Current literature provides limited insight into the true outcomes of nonoperative management and operative management in this patient population.

Objective: To investigate the outcomes of nonoperative management vs operative management of proximal femoral fractures in institutionalized frail older patients with limited life expectancy.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter cohort study was conducted between September 1, 2018, and April 25, 2020, with a 6-month follow-up period at 25 hospitals across the Netherlands. Eligible patients were aged 70 years or older, frail, and institutionalized and sustained a femoral neck or pertrochanteric fracture. The term frail implied at least 1 of the following characteristics was present: malnutrition (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] <18.5) or cachexia, severe comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class of IV or V), or severe mobility issues (Functional Ambulation Category ≤2).

Exposures: Shared decision-making (SDM) followed by nonoperative or operative fracture management.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D) utility score by proxies and caregivers. Secondary outcome measures were QUALIDEM (a dementia-specific quality-of-life instrument for persons with dementia in residential settings) scores, pain level (assessed by the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors With Limited Ability to Communicate), adverse events (Clavien-Dindo classification), mortality, treatment satisfaction (numeric rating scale), and quality of dying (Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire).

Results: Of the 172 enrolled patients with proximal femoral fractures (median [25th and 75th percentile] age, 88 [85-92] years; 135 women [78%]), 88 opted for nonoperative management and 84 opted for operative management. The EQ-5D utility scores by proxies and caregivers in the nonoperative management group remained within the set 0.15 noninferiority limit of the operative management group (week 1: 0.17 [95% CI, 0.13-0.29] vs 0.26 [95% CI, 0.11-0.23]; week 2: 0.19 [95% CI, 0.10-0.27] vs 0.28 [95% CI, 0.22-0.35]; and week 4: 0.24 [95% CI, 0.15-0.33] vs 0.34 [95% CI, 0.28-0.41]). Adverse events were less frequent in the nonoperative management group vs the operative management group (67 vs 167). The 30-day mortality rate was 83% (n = 73) in the nonoperative management group and 25% (n = 21) in the operative management group, with 26 proxies and caregivers (51%) in the nonoperative management group rating the quality of dying as good-almost perfect. Treatment satisfaction was high in both groups, with a median numeric rating scale score of 8.

Conclusions and relevance: Results of this study indicated that nonoperative management of proximal femoral fractures (selected through an SDM process) was a viable option for frail institutionalized patients with limited life expectancy, suggesting that surgery should not be a foregone conclusion for this patient population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Van Lieshout reported being a scientific manager of the Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation research program during the conduct of the study. Dr Joosse reported receiving personal fees from Stryker outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flowchart of Participants and Measurements During the Study Period
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. EuroQoL-5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D) Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score for Patients in the Nonoperative Management (NOM) and Operative Management (OM) Groups, According to Proxies and Caregivers
The gray area indicates the 0.15 noninferiority limit of the 95% CI of the utility score in the OM group (the reference group). The dotted line indicates the unadjusted measurements for fewer than 10 patients. Circles represent the mean score and the error bars indicate the 95% CI. The numbers of patients indicate those for whom EQ-5D utility and VAS scores could be ascertained at different follow-up times.

Comment in

References

    1. Gjertsen JE, Baste V, Fevang JM, Furnes O, Engesæter LB. Quality of life following hip fractures: results from the Norwegian hip fracture register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:265. doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1111-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van de Ree CLP, Landers MJF, Kruithof N, et al. . Effect of frailty on quality of life in elderly patients after hip fracture: a longitudinal study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e025941. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025941 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beaupre LA, Jones CA, Johnston DW, Wilson DM, Majumdar SR. Recovery of function following a hip fracture in geriatric ambulatory persons living in nursing homes: prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(7):1268-1273. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04033.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panula J, Pihlajamäki H, Mattila VM, et al. . Mortality and cause of death in hip fracture patients aged 65 or older: a population-based study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:105. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-105 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu F, Jiang C, Shen J, Tang P, Wang Y. Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2012;43(6):676-685. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.017 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types