Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 25:55:e0191.
doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0191-2021. eCollection 2022.

Clinical Impact of the Line Probe Assay and Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay in the Presumptive Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Brazil: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial

Affiliations

Clinical Impact of the Line Probe Assay and Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay in the Presumptive Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Brazil: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial

Afranio Kritski et al. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. .

Abstract

Background: Rapid molecular methods such as the line probe assay (LPA) and Xpert® MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) have been recommended by the World Health Organization for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) diagnosis. We conducted an interventional trial in DR-TB reference centers in Brazil to evaluate the impact of the use of LPA and Xpert.

Methods: Patients with DR-TB were eligible if their drug susceptibility testing results were available to the treating physician at the time of consultation. The standard reference MGITTM 960 was compared with Xpert (arm 1) and LPA (arm 2). Effectiveness was considered as the start of the appropriate TB regimen that matched drug susceptibility testing (DST) and the proportions of culture conversion and favorable treatment outcomes after 6 months.

Results: A higher rate of empirical treatment was observed with MGIT alone than with the Xpert assay (97.0% vs. 45.0%) and LPA (98.2% vs. 67.5%). Patients started appropriate TB treatment more quickly than those in the MGIT group (median 15.0 vs. 40.5 days; p<0.01) in arm 1. Compared to the MGIT group, culture conversion after 6 months was higher for Xpert in arm 1 (90.9% vs. 79.3%, p=0.39) and LPA in arm 2 (80.0% vs. 83.0%, p=0.81).

Conclusions: In the Xpert arm, there was a significant reduction in days to the start of appropriate anti-TB treatment and a trend towards greater culture conversion in the sixth month.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 1:. Flow diagram of presumed DR-TB with DST conducted at five reference centers, Brazil.

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Global Tuberculosis Report 2020. Geneva: WHO; 2020. [2021 Sept 22]. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131 .
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Use of liquid TB culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) in low and medium income settings. Summary report of the expert group meeting on the use of liquid culture media. Geneva: WHO; 2007. pp. 1–14.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Moving research findings into new WHO policies. WHO; Geneva: 2008. [2021 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/tb/advisory_bodies/research_to_policy/en/
    1. Albert H, Nathavitharana RR, Isaacs C, Pai M, Denkinger CM, Boehme CC. Development, roll-out and impact of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis: what lessons have we learnt and how can we do better? Eur Respir J. 2016;48(2):516–525. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Global strategy and targets for tuberculosis prevention, care and control after 2015. WHO; Geneva: 2018. [2021 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/tb/post_2015_tb_presentation.pdf .

Publication types

MeSH terms