Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):55.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01627-y.

Comparison of two invasive non-surgical treatment options for uterine myomas: uterine artery embolization and magnetic resonance guided high intensity focused ultrasound-systematic review

Affiliations

Comparison of two invasive non-surgical treatment options for uterine myomas: uterine artery embolization and magnetic resonance guided high intensity focused ultrasound-systematic review

Madina Yerezhepbayeva et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) and Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgHIFU) are two noninvasive treatments for uterine leiomyoma.

Methods: This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, analyzed the effectiveness of two treatments by comparing percent fibroid volume shrinkage immediately after the procedure and after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up and also assessed and compared common complications following treatment. The search utilized Science Direct, PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar and BioMed Central databases, selecting manuscripts published during the period 2000 and 2020. Studies with premenopausal patients with previous treatments for uterine leiomyoma and/or with other pelvic diseases were excluded.

Results: Twenty-nine papers satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results were pooled and stratified by treatment and follow-up time. Weighted fibroid volume percent shrinkage after UAE was statistically significantly greater than MRgHIFU at 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up times. However, UAE had statistically significantly more complications, such as pain, nausea and vomiting. However, this study cannot conclude that UAE is more effective than MRgHIFU due to confounding factors.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance guided high intensity focused ultrasound; Uterine artery embolization; Uterine fibroid; Uterine leiomyoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart diagram to select eligible papers

References

    1. Sohn GS, Cho S, Kim YM, Cho CH, Kim MR, Lee SR, Working Group of Society of Uterine Leiomyoma Current medical treatment of uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(2):192–201. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.2.192. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laughlin-Tommaso SK. Non-surgical management of myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(2):229–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.642. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vilos GA, Allaire C, Laberge PY, Leyland N. The management of uterine myomas. J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;37(2):157–178. - PubMed
    1. Zou M, Chen L, Wu C, Hu C, Xiong Y. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with uterine fibroids treated with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;124(S3):30–35. - PubMed
    1. Guo XC, Segars JH. The impact and management of fibroids for fertility: an evidence-based approach. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2012;39(4):521–533. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.09.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types