Experience with denosumab (XGEVA®) for prevention of skeletal-related events in the 10 years after approval
- PMID: 35242510
- PMCID: PMC8857591
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100416
Experience with denosumab (XGEVA®) for prevention of skeletal-related events in the 10 years after approval
Abstract
Skeletal-related events (SREs) are complications of bone metastases and carry a significant patient and economic burden. Denosumab is a receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) inhibitor approved for SRE prevention in patients with multiple myeloma and patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. In phase 3 trials, denosumab showed superiority to the bisphosphonate zoledronate in reducing the risk of first on-study SRE by 17% (median time to first on-study SRE delayed by 8.2 months) and the risk of first and subsequent on-study SREs by 18% across multiple solid tumor types, including some patients with multiple myeloma. Denosumab also improved pain outcomes and reduced the need for strong opioids. Additionally, a phase 3 trial showed denosumab was noninferior to zoledronate in delaying time to first SRE in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Denosumab has a convenient 120 mg every 4 weeks recommended dosing schedule with subcutaneous administration. Rare but serious toxicities associated with denosumab include osteonecrosis of the jaw, hypocalcemia, and atypical femoral fracture events, with multiple vertebral fractures reported following treatment discontinuation. After a decade of real-world clinical experience with denosumab, we are still learning about the optimal use and dosing for denosumab. Despite the emergence of novel and effective antitumor therapies, there remains a strong rationale for the clinical utility of antiresorptive therapy for SRE prevention. Ongoing studies aim to optimize clinical management of patients using denosumab for SRE prevention while maintaining safety and efficacy.
Keywords: AFF, Atypical femoral fracture; BM, Bone metastasis; BMFS, BM-free survival; BP, Bisphosphonate; BTA, Bone-targeting agent; Bone metastasis; CI, Confidence interval; Denosumab; Efficacy; HR, Hazard ratio; HRQoL, Health-related quality of life; IMWG, International Myeloma Working Group; MM, Multiple myeloma; MVF, Multiple vertebral fracture; NSCLC, Non–small-cell lung cancer; ONJ, Osteonecrosis of the jaw; OPG, Osteoprotegerin; OS, Overall survival; PFS, Progression-free survival; Q12W, Every 12 weeks; Q4W, Every 4 weeks; RANKL, Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; SC, Subcutaneous; SRE, Skeletal-related event; Safety; Skeletal-related events; uNTx/Cr, Urinary N-telopeptide normalized to urinary creatinine.
© 2022 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Benoit Cadieux was an employee and shareholder of Amgen Inc. at the time of the development of this review. Robert Coleman has received lecture fees from Amgen and Novartis; consultancy fees from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, ITM, and Scancell. Pegah Jafarinasabian is an employee and shareholder of Amgen Inc. Allan Lipton has no financial interests or personal relationships that may be considered as potential competing interests. Robert Z. Orlowski has no financial interests or personal relationships that may be considered as potential competing interests.. Fred Saad served as a consultant, advisory board member and received honoraria and research funding from Amgen; he has also served as a consultant, advisory board member and received honoraria and research funding from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, Myovant, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Giorgio V. Scagliotti has no financial interests or personal relationships that may be considered as potential competing interests. Kazuyuki Shimiz has no financial interests or personal relationships that may be considered as potential competing interests. Alison Stopeck has received consulting fees from Amgen and AstraZeneca; contracted research support from Amgen, Exact Sciences; speakers bureau from Exact Sciences; and honoraria from Amgen.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Risk factors associated with skeletal-related events following discontinuation of denosumab treatment among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors: A real-world machine learning approach.J Bone Oncol. 2022 Mar 17;34:100423. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100423. eCollection 2022 Jun. J Bone Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35378840 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical efficacy and safety of long-term treatment, discontinuation, and extended dosing intervals of denosumab treatment for solid cancer bone metastasis: A retrospective study.J Orthop Sci. 2025 May 2:S0949-2658(25)00133-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.012. Online ahead of print. J Orthop Sci. 2025. PMID: 40318921
-
Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma.J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1125-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.3304. Epub 2011 Feb 22. J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21343556 Clinical Trial.
-
Therapeutic Potential of Denosumab in Patients With Lung Cancer: Beyond Prevention of Skeletal Complications.Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Nov;16(6):431-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 25. Clin Lung Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26264596 Review.
-
Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in the Prevention of Skeletal-related Events in Vulnerable Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials.Clin Ther. 2020 Aug;42(8):1494-1507.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jul 24. Clin Ther. 2020. PMID: 32718784
Cited by
-
Multicenter study on atypical femoral fractures in patients with bone metastases taking bone- modifying agents.J Bone Oncol. 2023 Apr 10;40:100478. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100478. eCollection 2023 Jun. J Bone Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37180736 Free PMC article.
-
Denosumab administration for bone metastases from solid tumors: a retrospective cross-sectional study.BMC Cancer. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11495-w. BMC Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37853409 Free PMC article.
-
Atypical tibial fracture in breast cancer patient with bone metastasis receiving denosumab therapy: a case report and review of the literature.J Med Case Rep. 2023 Jun 21;17(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13256-023-03999-7. J Med Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37340320 Free PMC article. Review.
-
No overshoot of bone turnover after withdrawal of denosumab treatment of adults with Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a prospective clinical trial.Osteoporos Int. 2025 Jul;36(7):1231-1237. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07538-6. Epub 2025 May 26. Osteoporos Int. 2025. PMID: 40418338 Clinical Trial.
-
Computed tomography Hounsfield unit values as a treatment response indicator for spinal metastatic lesions in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study in Japan.Asian Spine J. 2025 Feb;19(1):46-53. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0334. Epub 2025 Jan 20. Asian Spine J. 2025. PMID: 39829178 Free PMC article.
References
-
- von Moos R., Body J.-J., Egerdie B., Stopeck A., Brown J., Fallowfield L., Patrick D.L., Cleeland C., Damyanov D., Palazzo F.S., Marx G., Zhou Y., Braun A., Balakumaran A., Qian Y.i. Pain and analgesic use associated with skeletal-related events in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases. Support. Care Cancer. 2016;24(3):1327–1337. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Coleman R.E. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12(20):6243s–6249s. - PubMed
-
- Coleman R.E., Croucher P.I., Padhani A.R., Clezardin P., Chow E., Fallon M., Guise T., Colangeli S., Capanna R., Costa L. Bone metastases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2020;6(1):83. - PubMed