Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 25:7:7.
doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.04.02. eCollection 2022.

Confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastro-intestinal endoscopy: technical aspects and clinical applications

Affiliations
Review

Confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastro-intestinal endoscopy: technical aspects and clinical applications

Nastazja Dagny Pilonis et al. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. .

Abstract

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is an advanced endoscopic imaging technology that provides a magnified, cellular level view of gastrointestinal epithelia. In conjunction with topical or intravenous fluorescent dyes, CLE allows for an "optical biopsy" for real-time diagnosis. Two different CLE system have been used in clinical endoscopy, probe-based CLE (pCLE) and endoscope-based CLE (eCLE). Using pCLE, the device can be delivered: (I) into the luminal gastrointestinal tract through the working channel of standard endoscopes; (II) into extraluminal cystic and solid parenchymal lesions through an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) needle; or (III) into the biliary system through an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) accessory channel. With eCLE, the probe is directly integrated into the tip of a conventional endoscope, however, these endoscopes are no longer commercially available. CLE has moderate to high diagnostic accuracy for neoplastic and inflammatory conditions through the gastrointestinal tract including: oesophageal, gastric and colonic neoplasia, pancreatic cysts and solid lesions, malignant pancreatobiliary strictures and inflammatory bowel disease. Some studies have demonstrated the diagnostic benefit of CLE imaging when combined with either conventional white light endoscopy or advanced imaging technologies. Therefore, optical biopsies using CLE can resolve diagnostic dilemmas in some cases where conventional imaging fails to achieve conclusive results. CLE could also reduce the requirement for extensive tissue sampling during surveillance procedures. In the future, CLE in combination with molecular probes, could allow for the molecular characterization of diseases and assess response to targeted therapy. However, the narrow field of view, high capital costs and specialized operator training requirements remain the main limitations. Future multi-center, randomized trials with a focus on conventional diagnostic applications, cost-effectiveness and standardized training will be required for definitive evidence. The objective of this review is to evaluate the technical aspects and current applications of CLE in patients with gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary diseases and discuss future directions for this technique.

Keywords: Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE); colon cancer; esophageal cancer; fluorescent endoscopy; image enhanced endoscopy; inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); pancreatic cancer; stomach cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tgh.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tgh.2020.04.02/coif). The series “Advanced endoscopic imaging of the GI tract” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Principles of confocal laser endomicroscopy. The light passing through a pinhole is reflected by the beam splitter and then focused by the objective lens. The tissue is illuminated and the fluorescence emitted is collected by the objective. A pin hole placed before the detector allows to reject the light signal from out-of-focus tissue layers. Magnification: 10×.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CLE technologies. (A) Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy system (pCLE) (Mauna Kea Technologies, Paris, France). (B) pCLE probe can be delivered in vivo through the standard 2.8 mm endoscope channel. (C) Endoscope-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (eCLE). The arrows point to the different components of the eCLE system. Adapted from De Palma GD, World J Gastroenterol, 2009. CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Normal squamous epithelium in oesophagus-dark, homogeneous epithelial cells with regular architecture and clearly visible borders, capillaries directed toward the epithelium within the lamina propria, without penetration of the contrast agent into the surrounding tissue. Adapted from Templeton A, et al., Clin Endosc, 2013.
Figure 4
Figure 4
pCLE criteria for low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. (A) Dark non-round glands. (B) Variable degree of darkness with sharp cut-off. (C) Cellular stratification. (D) Poorly identifiable goblet cells. (E) Glands unequal in size and shape. (F) Non-equidistant and irregular cells. (G) “Saw-toothed” epithelial surface. (H) Non-equidistant glands. (I) Enlarged cells. pCLE, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Oesophageal squamous carcinoma-squamous cells are irregularly arranged and differ in size and morphology. Capillary leakage of fluorescein is observed. Magnification: 1,000×. Adapted from Liu J, et al., PLoS One, 2014.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The pCLE appearance of normal and pathological gastric mucosa. (A) Normal cardiac mucosa-regular pits with wide openings. (B) Dysplastic gastric-dark epithelium with irregular and varying thickness is observed. (C) Differentiated adenocarcinoma-disorganized epithelium with dark and irregular glands. (D) Undifferentiated adenocarcinoma-dark and irregular cells with no identifiable glandular structures are observed. Adapted from Kin MY, et al., World J Gastroenterol, 2016. pCLE, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The eCLE appearance of normal and pathological gastric mucosa. (A) Normal gastric mucosa in the fundus - gastric pits are round (solid arrow), net-like subepithelial capillary network patterns surround the gastric pits (dash arrow). (B) Normal gastric mucosa in the body-gastric pits are round (solid arrow). Honeycomb-like subepithelial capillary network patterns surround the gastric pits (dash arrows). (C) Normal gastric mucosa in the antrum-gastric pits are the line type (solid arrow). Coil-shaped subepithelial capillary network patterns surround the gastric pits (dash arrow). (D) Low grade gastric intraepithelial neoplasia-different sizes of gastric pits, capillary network is thickening and circuitous. (E) High grade gastric intraepithelial neoplasia-abnormal arrangement of gastric pits. The thickening capillary network and the increasing branch present a mass shape. Magnification: 1,000×. Adapted from Shu-Fang W, et al., World J Gastroenterol, 2012. eCLE, endoscope-based confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The CLE appearance of normal and pathological small bowel mucosa. (A) Normal small bowel mucosa-normal epithelium border with regular capillary pattern. (B) Confocal image of celiac disease-Marsh type 3b. Magnification: 1,000×. Adapted from De Palma, GD, World J Gastroenterol, 2009; Venkatesh K, World J Gastroenterol, 2009. CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Figure 9
Figure 9
nCLE images of pancreas. (A) Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: a single papilla with a central fibrovascular core and overlying epithelium. (B) Serous cystadenoma: branching and tortuous network of multiple blood vessels in a “fern like” pattern. (C) Pseudocyst: clusters of bright, floating particles with a background which is nondescript and lacks blood vessels. (D) Mucinous cystic neoplasm: solitary epithelial bands without formation of papillae. Adapted from Krishna G, et al., World J Gastroenterol, 2015. nCLE, needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Figure 10
Figure 10
CLE images of biliary ducts. (A) Normal bile duct-reticular network of thin dark branching bands 20 µm. (B-E) Features of malignant bile duct strictures: (B) thick white bands (>20 µm), (C) thick dark bands (>40 µm), (D) epithelium, (E) dark clumps. (F-J) features of inflammatory bile duct strictures on confocal laser endomicroscopy: (F) thickened reticular structures, (G) multiple white bands, (H) dark granular pattern in scales, (I) increased spaces between scales. Magnification: 1,000×. Adopted from Almadi et al., World J Gastroenterol, 2015. CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Figure 11
Figure 11
CLE images of colonic mucosa. (A) Normal colonic mucosa-round shaped crypts, dark goblet cells, narrow and regular blood vessels surrounding the crypts. (B) Adenomatous polyp-irregular or villiform structures and a dark, irregularly thickened epithelium with a decreased number of goblet cells. (C) Adenocarcinoma-disorganized mucosa, lack of structure, elongated crypts, irregularly thickened epithelium, dilated and distorted blood vessels. Adapted from De Palma GD, et al., World J Gastroenterol, 2009. CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Figure 12
Figure 12
CLE images in inflammatory bowel diseases. (A) Active ulcerative colitis (distal colitis-the switch from normal mucosa (top of the figure) to inflamed mucosa with irregular arrangement of crypts, crypt fusion and capillaries alterations. (B) Crohn’s disease-dilated and distorted capillaries, altered crypt architecture, increased distance between the crypts. Magnification: 1,000×. Adapted from De Palma GD, et al., World J Gastroenterol, 2013. CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy.

References

    1. Goetz M, Toermer T, Vieth M, et al. Simultaneous confocal laser endomicroscopy and chromoendoscopy with topical cresyl violet. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:959-68. 10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li CQ, Yu T, Zuo XL, et al. Effects on confocal laser endomicroscopy image quality by different acriflavine concentrations. J Interv Gastroenterol 2011;1:59-63. 10.4161/jig.1.2.16828 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meyer RR, Simpson MV. DNA biosynthesis in mitochondria. Differential inhibition of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA polymerases by the mutagenic dyes ethidium bromide and acriflavin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1969;34:238-44. 10.1016/0006-291X(69)90637-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caulfield MJ, Burleson GR, Pollard M. Ozonation of mutagenic and carcinogenic alkylating agents, pesticides, aflatoxin B1, and benzidine in water. Cancer Res 1979;39:2155-9. - PubMed
    1. Wallace MB, Meining A, Canto MI, et al. The safety of intravenous fluorescein for confocal laser endomicroscopy in the gastrointestinal tract. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:548-52. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04207.x - DOI - PubMed