Impact of Hospital Volume on the Outcomes of Renal Trauma Management
- PMID: 35243394
- PMCID: PMC8883196
- DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.01.004
Impact of Hospital Volume on the Outcomes of Renal Trauma Management
Abstract
Background: Some health care systems have set up referral trauma centers to centralize expertise to improve trauma management. There is scant and controversial evidence regarding the impact of provider's volume on the outcomes of trauma management.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of hospital volume on the outcomes of renal trauma management in a European health care system.
Design setting and participants: A retrospective multicenter study, including all patients admitted for renal trauma in 17 French hospitals between 2005 and 2015, was conducted.
Intervention: Nephrectomy, angioembolization, or nonoperative management.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Four quartiles according to the caseload per year: low volume (eight or fewer per year), moderate volume (nine to 13 per year), high volume (14-25/yr), and very high volume (≥26/yr). The primary endpoint was failure of nonoperative management defined as any interventional radiology or surgical procedure needed within the first 30 d after admission.
Results and limitations: Of 1771 patients with renal trauma, 1704 were included. Nonoperative management was more prevalent in the very-high- and low-volume centers (p = 0.02). In a univariate analysis, very high hospital volume was associated with a lower risk of nonoperative management failure than low (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54; p = 0.05) and moderate (OR = 0.48; p = 0.02) hospital volume. There were fewer nephrectomies in the high- and very-high-volume groups (p = 0.003). In a multivariate analysis, very high volume remained associated with a lower risk of nonoperative management failure than low (OR = 0.48; p = 0.04) and moderate (OR = 0.42; p = 0.01) volume. Study limitations include all the shortcomings inherent to its retrospective multicenter design.
Conclusions: In this multicenter study, management of renal trauma varied according to hospital volume. There were lower rates of nephrectomy and failure of nonoperative management in very-high-volume centers. These results raise the question of centralizing the management of renal trauma, which is currently not the case in our health care system.
Patient summary: In this study, management of renal trauma varied according to hospital volume. Very-high-volume centers had lower rates of nephrectomy and failure of nonoperative management.
Keywords: Centralization; Complication; Hospital volume; Outcomes; Renal trauma.
© 2022 The Author(s).
Similar articles
-
Impact of Trauma Center Designation and Interfacility Transfer on Renal Trauma Outcomes: Evidence for Universal Management.Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Nov;5(6):1135-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 20. Eur Urol Focus. 2019. PMID: 29934273
-
Factors Predictive of Selective Angioembolization Failure for Moderate- to High-grade Renal Trauma: A French Multi-institutional Study.Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jan;8(1):253-258. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 25. Eur Urol Focus. 2022. PMID: 33509672
-
Comparison of nonoperative and surgical management of renal trauma: Can we predict when nonoperative management fails?J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Feb;82(2):356-361. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001316. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017. PMID: 27893642
-
Is Nonoperative Management the Best First-line Option for High-grade Renal trauma? A Systematic Review.Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 May 29. Eur Urol Focus. 2019. PMID: 28753890
-
Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults: there is (still) a long way to go. The results of the Bologna-Maggiore Hospital trauma center experience and development of a clinical algorithm.Surg Today. 2015 Oct;45(10):1210-7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1084-0. Epub 2014 Dec 5. Surg Today. 2015. PMID: 25476466 Review.
Cited by
-
Mortality and its predictors in abdominal injury across sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 11;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00982-3. BMC Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38605305 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting Genitourinary Injuries in Polytraumatized Patients-Development of the GUIPP Scoring System.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 27;12(23):7341. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237341. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38068393 Free PMC article.
-
Thirty-five years of the French Association of Urologists in Training (AFUF) a scoping review and bibliometric analysis of scientific literature conducted by urologists in training.World J Urol. 2024 Nov 4;42(1):624. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05292-8. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39496823
References
-
- Santucci R.A., Wessells H., Bartsch G., et al. Evaluation and management of renal injuries: consensus statement of the Renal Trauma Subcommittee: Renal Trauma Consensus statement. BJU Int. 2004;93:937–954. - PubMed
-
- Sujenthiran A., Elshout P.J., Veskimae E., et al. Is nonoperative management the best first-line option for high-grade renal trauma? A systematic review. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5:290–300. - PubMed
-
- Peyronnet B., Mathieu R., Couapel J.-P., Verhoest G., Bensalah K. Traumatismes fermés du rein et de l’uretère. EMC Urol. 2012;5:1–10.
-
- Bryk D.J., Zhao L.C. Guideline of guidelines: a review of urological trauma guidelines. BJU Int. 2016;117:226–234. - PubMed
-
- EAU. EAU guidelines on trauma. 2019. https://uroweb.org/guideline/urological-trauma/.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources