Continuous-wave versus range-gated pulsed Doppler power frequency spectrum analysis in the detection of carotid arterial occlusive disease

Abstract

Two types of ultrasonic Doppler velocity metering devices currently used in the detection of extracranial carotid artery disease, the continuous-wave (CW) and the range-gated pulsed (RP) Doppler systems, were compared in the present study. Power frequency spectrum analysis (PFSA) was performed on 130 carotid arterial bifurcations with a CW Doppler and 81 carotid arteries with an RP Doppler system. All results were compared with angiographic findings. The frequency bandwidth at 50% peak power (f50%), a quantitative index for defining spectral broadening, detected stenoses equal to or greater than 50% diameter reduction with 93% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 92% accuracy with the CW system. With the RP Doppler, the same degree of stenosis was identified with 94% sensitivity, 93% specificity, and 93% accuracy. Compared with angiographic classification into 0-24%, 25-49%, and 50-99% diameter reduction categories, CW Doppler PFSA and an 85% overall accuracy, and the RP Doppler overall accuracy was 86%. CW Doppler also correctly identified 15 of 16 internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusions; 8 of 8 ICA occlusions were correctly identified with the RP Doppler. Thus, both techniques detected carotid artery disease with comparable results. For research and ease of operation, an RP Doppler system with a variable sampling volume appears to be most desirable. However, a standard CW system is superior if utility and cost-effectiveness are of prime importance.