Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 4;9(1):72.
doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01159-y.

A reference set of clinically relevant adverse drug-drug interactions

Affiliations

A reference set of clinically relevant adverse drug-drug interactions

Elpida Kontsioti et al. Sci Data. .

Abstract

The accurate and timely detection of adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs) during the postmarketing phase is an important yet complex task with potentially major clinical implications. The development of data mining methodologies that scan healthcare databases for drug safety signals requires appropriate reference sets for performance evaluation. Methodologies for establishing DDI reference sets are limited in the literature, while there is no publicly available resource simultaneously focusing on clinical relevance of DDIs and individual behaviour of interacting drugs. By automatically extracting and aggregating information from multiple clinical resources, we provide a scalable approach for generating a reference set for DDIs that could support research in postmarketing safety surveillance. CRESCENDDI contains 10,286 positive and 4,544 negative controls, covering 454 drugs and 179 adverse events mapped to RxNorm and MedDRA concepts, respectively. It also includes single drug information for the included drugs (i.e., adverse drug reactions, indications, and negative drug-event associations). We demonstrate usability of the resource by scanning a spontaneous reporting system database for signals of DDIs using traditional signal detection algorithms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

EK receives PhD studentship that is jointly funded by AstraZeneca and the EPSRC. MP receives research funding from various organizations including the MRC and NIHR. He has also received partnership funding for the MRC Clinical Pharmacology Training Scheme (co-funded by MRC and Roche, UCB, Eli Lilly and Novartis) and grant funding from Vistagen Therapeutics. He has also unrestricted educational grant support for the UK Pharmacogenetics and Stratified Medicine Network from Bristol-Myers Squibb and UCB. He has developed an HLA genotyping panel with MC Diagnostics, but does not benefit financially from this. He is part of the IMI Consortium ARDAT (www.ardat.org). These funding sources were not utilized for this work. BD was AstraZeneca’s employee and shareholder when this article was submitted but has since ended his relationship with both.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Data analysis workflow to generate positive and negative controls from DDI online resources with associated evidence for their component drugs. (1) DDI and single-drug online resources data (a) are extracted and stored to separate tables (b,c). (2) Drug names are normalized (d). (3) The intersection of the DDI online resources is extracted to a different table (e) and (4) English language text descriptions (for DDIs and single-drug ADRs) are annotated for AEs (after drug name masking) (f). (A) DDI pairs from (e) are assigned AEs based on the description mappings (g). Positive controls are published in Data Record 1. (B) Negative controls are generated using drugs and AEs from (g), ensuring that drug pairs cannot be found in (b) or in PubMed using a customized query (h). Negative controls are published in Data Record 2. (C) The filtered set of drugs from (d) is linked to AE and indication concepts using available evidence from (c) and negative controls for single drugs are generated following a similar process to the one described above for DDIs (i.e., drug-event is not an ADR mentioned in (c) or in PubMed using a customized query) (i). ADRs, indications and negative controls for single drugs are published in Data Record 3. Data Records 4 and 5 contain mappings of drug names and text descriptions for events, respectively. Column headers appear in grey font next to each Data Record box. Sample records from (b), (c) and (e) can be found in the bottom part of the figure.

References

    1. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2019. (2021). - PubMed
    1. Tannenbaum C, Sheehan NL. Understanding and preventing drug-drug and drug-gene interactions. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology. 2014;7:533–544. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2014.910111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magro L, Moretti U, Leone R. Epidemiology and characteristics of adverse drug reactions caused by drug–drug interactions. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2012;11:83–94. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2012.631910. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li Y, Ryan PB, Wei Y, Friedman C. A Method to Combine Signals from Spontaneous Reporting Systems and Observational Healthcare Data to Detect Adverse Drug Reactions. Drug Saf. 2015;38:895–908. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0314-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li Y, Jimeno Yepes A, Xiao C. Combining Social Media and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System to Detect Adverse Drug Reactions. Drug Saf. 2020;43:893–903. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00943-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms