Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;36(5):2771-2777.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09074-4. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

Remote telesurgery in humans: a systematic review

Patrick Barba  1   2 , Joshua Stramiello  2 , Emily K Funk  2 , Florian Richter  3 , Michael C Yip  3 , Ryan K Orosco  4   5   6   7
Affiliations

Remote telesurgery in humans: a systematic review

Patrick Barba et al. Surg Endosc. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: Since the conception of robotic surgery, remote telesurgery has been a dream upon which incredible technological advances haven been built. Despite the considerable enthusiasm for, there have been few published studies of remote telesurgery on humans.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of the English literature (PubMed, EMbase, Inspec & Compendex and Web of Science) to report studies of remote telesurgery in humans. Keywords included telesurgery, remote surgery, long-distance surgery, and telerobotics. Subjects had to be human (live patients or cadavers). The operating surgeon had to be remote from the patient, separated by more than one kilometer. The article had to explicitly report the use of a long-distance telerobotic technique. Articles that focused on telepresence or tele-mentoring were excluded.

Results: The study included eight articles published from 2001 to 2020. One manuscript (1 subject) described remote surgery on a cadaver model, and the other seven were on live humans (72 subjects). Procedure types included percutaneous, endovascular, laparoscopic, and transoral. Communication methods varied, with the first report using a telephone line and the most recent studies using a 5G network. Six of the studies reported signal latency as a single value and it ranged from 28 ms to 280 ms.

Conclusions: Few studies have described remote telesurgery in humans, and there is considerable variability in robotic and communication methods. Future efforts should work to improve reporting of signal latency and follow careful research methodology.

Keywords: Motion scaling; Robotic surgery; Signal latency; Telerobotics; Telesurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Systematic review flow diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Raison N, Khan MS, Challacombe B (2015) Telemedicine in surgery: what are the opportunities and hurdles to realising the potential? Curr Urol Rep 16:43. - PubMed
    1. Veneziano D, Tafuri A, Rivas JG, Dourado A, Okhunov Z, Somani BK, Marino N, Fuchs G, Cacciamani G, Group E-Y (2020) Is remote live urologic surgery a reality? evidences from a systematic review of the literature. World J Urol 38:2367–2376 - PubMed
    1. Evans CR, Medina MG, Dwyer AM (2018) Telemedicine and telerobotics: from science fiction to reality. Updates Surg 70:357–362 - PubMed
    1. Erridge S, Yeung DKT, Patel HRH, Purkayastha S (2019) Telementoring of surgeons: a systematic review. Surg Innov 26:95–111 - PubMed
    1. Bauer J, Lee BR, Stoianovici DAN, Ph D, Bishoff JAYT, Micali S, Micali F, Kavoussi LR (2001) Remote percutaneous renal access using a new automated telesurgical robotic system. Telemed J e-health 7:341–346 - PubMed

Publication types