Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;32(4):685-696.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10029-8. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

Swedish managers' experience-based understanding of the Capacity to work in employees with Common Mental Disorders: a Focus Group Study

Ellinor Tengelin  1 , Gunnel Hensing  2 , Kristina Holmgren  3 , Christian Ståhl  4 , Monica Bertilsson  2
Affiliations

Swedish managers' experience-based understanding of the Capacity to work in employees with Common Mental Disorders: a Focus Group Study

Ellinor Tengelin et al. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Understanding of the capacity to work among employees with common mental disorders (CMDs) is important, but contemporary knowledge on this issue lacks the managers' perspective. The aim of this study was to explore and describe managers' experience-based understanding of capacity to work in employees with CMD.

Methods: A qualitative focus group study was designed. Managers with experience in supporting employees with CMD were recruited via organizations and networks. Eight focus group interviews with 31 participants took place.

Results: The analysis resulted in five categories. (1) Capacity to mentally focus on work tasks decreases or disappears, with negative consequences for work output. (2) Capacity to commit to continuous and coherent task changes, making tasks that span longer periods of time difficult. (3) Capacity to independently adapt to the needs of the situation decreases, and employees need more guidance and instructions than usual. (4) Capacity to keep up professional appearances is reduced, and the employees struggle with the professional role. (5) Ability to interact socially and professionally decreases, which potentially causes conflicts at the workplace.

Conclusions: This study adds managers' perspective to the increasing knowledge on how capacity to work is influenced by CMDs. Managers understand CMDs in employees as changed, reducing the capacities needed for occupational functioning. A deeper understanding of reduced capacity to work is needed to adapt workplaces, and our findings can facilitate work accommodations for employees with CMDs.

Keywords: Focus groups; Occupational health; Psychiatry; Qualitative research; Work performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L. The person-environment-occupation model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther. 1996;63(1):9–23. - PubMed
    1. Corbière M, Mazaniello–Chézol M, Bastien M, Wathieu E, Bouchard R, Panaccio A, et al. Stakeholders’ role and actions in the return–to–work process of workers on sick–leave due to common mental disorders: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2020;30:381–419. - PubMed
    1. Seeing I, et al. Policy and practice of work ability: a negotiation of responsibility in organizing return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):553–64. - PubMed
    1. Bertilsson M, Petersson E, Östlund G, Waern M, Hensing G. Capacity to work while depressed and anxious – a phenomenological study. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(20):1705–11. - PubMed
    1. Thisted C, Nielsen C, Bjerrum M. Work participation among employees with common mental disorders: a meta-synthesis. J Occup Rehab. 2018;28:452–64. - PubMed

Publication types