Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;92(8):815-821.
doi: 10.1111/josh.13158. Epub 2022 Mar 5.

Dose Matters in Evaluation of a School-Based Adolescent Sexual Health Education Program

Amy D Benton  1 , Erica Nason  1 , Carol Lewis  2 , Aubrey Vinklarek  2 , Alda Santana  3
Affiliations

Dose Matters in Evaluation of a School-Based Adolescent Sexual Health Education Program

Amy D Benton et al. J Sch Health. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Research on the effects of intervention dose on outcomes within adolescent sexual health education programming is lacking. Existing research on dose typically utilizes the number of sessions as a variable. In a school setting, there are scheduling limitations, student absences, and other logistical barriers that have the potential to affect the number of sessions for an intervention and, in turn, impact the efficacy of programming.

Methods: This article evaluates the effectiveness of a school-based, peer-led adolescent comprehensive sexual health education program, with a focus on dose. A repeated measures MANOVA was used to evaluate the effects of individual difference variables and intervention variables on changes in participants' knowledge and attitudes across 2 time points. Additionally, paired t-tests were used to evaluate changes in specific behaviors.

Results: Results indicated that knowledge improved following the intervention, and specifically larger doses, measured in minutes, of the intervention were associated with larger improvements in knowledge. There were no significant effects related to attitudes or behavioral outcomes.

Conclusions: This study adds to the knowledge base by including analysis of how the dose of intervention may impact youth outcomes. Implications for school health practices and research are discussed.

Keywords: adolescent sexual health education; comprehensive sex education; dose/dosage; pregnancy prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors of this article declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Knowledge and Attitudes Scores Across Timepoints
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jemmott JB 3rd, Jemmott LS, Fong GT. Abstinence and safer sex HIV risk‐reduction interventions for African American adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;279(19):1529‐1536. 10.1001/jama.279.19.1529. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kohler PK, Manhart LE, Lafferty WE. Abstinence‐only and comprehensive sex education and the initiation of sexual activity and teen pregnancy. J Adolesc Health. 2008;42(4):344‐351. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Starkman N, Rajani N. The case for comprehensive sex education. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2002;16(7):313‐318. 10.1089/108729102320231144. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirby DB, Laris BA, Rolleri LA. Sex and HIV education programs: their impact on sexual behaviors of young people throughout the world. J Adolesc Health. 2007. Mar;40(3):206‐217. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.11.143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panchaud C, Anderson R. Demystifying data: using evidence to improve young people's sexual health and rights‐workshop toolkit. Guttmacher Institute; 2016. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_downloads/demystif.... Accessed October 21, 2021.