Normalising disclosure or reinforcing heroism? An exploratory critical discourse analysis of mental health stigma in medical education
- PMID: 35246993
- DOI: 10.1111/medu.14790
Normalising disclosure or reinforcing heroism? An exploratory critical discourse analysis of mental health stigma in medical education
Abstract
Introduction: There has been a proliferation of initiatives targeted towards improving psychological wellbeing among medical learners. Yet many learners do not seek assistance due to stigma against help seeking. Understanding the prevailing discourses on the effects of mental health stigma in the context of medical education will improve insight on how to address stigma and improve wellbeing. In this study, the authors sought to explore discourses on stigma in medical education through a Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis.
Methods: The authors assembled several sets of texts related to stigma in medical education. The initial archive consisted of social media discourse and was expanded to include digital news media. Next, the authors conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with medical students, residents and faculty. Using principles of Critical Discourse Analysis informed by the writings of Michel Foucault, the authors analysed the archive to identify truth statements, representative statements and discursive effects.
Results: Analysis revealed an emancipatory discourse of disclosure that normalised help-seeking, which conflicted with a discourse of performance. Results suggested that public disclosure remains challenging in private contexts due to a medical culture that rewards perfectionism and lauds heroism. Discourses on performance positioned disclosure as disruptive to the system's need to maintain its own hegemony. Overall, stigma was perceived as rooted within the structural power of the medical education system and society at large.
Conclusion: Discourses on stigma in medical education hold implications for the teaching, learning and overall wellbeing of medical learners. The tensions between discourses on disclosure and performance have the potential to perpetuate further distress for learners and worsen asymmetries in power. Interventions to address stigma would benefit from understanding and addressing the role of power and hierarchy in maintaining and dismantling stigma.
© 2022 Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Mental health self-disclosure: From stigma to empowerment.Med Educ. 2022 Aug;56(8):784-787. doi: 10.1111/medu.14816. Epub 2022 May 10. Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 35485396 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Brazeau CMLR, Schroeder R, Rovi S, Boyd L. Relationships between medical student burnout, empathy, and professionalism climate. Acad Med. 2010;85(10):33-36.
-
- Jennings ML, Slavin SJ. Resident wellness matters. Acad Med. 2015;90(9):1246-1250. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000842
-
- Slavin SJ, Schindler DL, Chibnall JT. Medical student mental health 3.0: improving student wellness through curricular changes. Acad Med. 2014;89(4):573-577. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000166
-
- McKenna KM, Hashimoto DA, Mahuire MS, Bynum WE IV. The missing link: connection is the key to resilience in medical education. Acad Med. 2016;91(9):1197-1199. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001311
-
- Reed DA, Shanafelt TD, Satele DW, et al. Relationship of pass/fail grading and curriculum structure with well-being among preclinical medical students: a multi-institutional study. Acad Med. 2011;86(11):1367-1373. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182305d81
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
