Risk factors of unplanned intraoperative conversion to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery or open surgery in laparoscopic liver resection
- PMID: 35249169
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02466-z
Risk factors of unplanned intraoperative conversion to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery or open surgery in laparoscopic liver resection
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is possible in many patients, but pure LLR is sometimes difficult to complete, and unplanned intraoperative hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) or open conversion is sometimes necessary. However, appropriate indications and timing for conversion are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the indications for HALS and open conversion from pure LLR.
Methods: We collected data from 208 patients who underwent LLR from January 2010 to February 2021 in our department. We retrospectively examined these data between cases of unplanned intraoperative HALS conversion, open conversion, and pure LLR, and clarified risk factors and indications for HALS or open conversion.
Results: There were 191 pure LLRs, nine HALS conversions, and eight open conversions. In the HALS conversion group versus pure LLR group, body mass index (BMI) (27.0 vs. 23.7 kg/m2, p = 0.047), proportions of patients with history of upper abdominal surgery (78% vs. 33%; p = 0.006), repeat hepatectomy (56% vs. 15%; p = 0.002), S7 or S8 tumor location (67% vs. 35%; p = 0.049), and difficulty score (DS) ≥ 7 (56% vs. 19%; p = 0.008) were significantly higher, and surgical time (339 vs. 239 min; p = 0.031) was significantly longer. However, postoperative states were not significantly different between the two groups. The BMI cutoff value for risk of unplanned intraoperative conversion determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was 25 kg/m2, and the proportion of patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (89% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the HALS conversion versus pure LLR group. In the open conversion group, although there were no significant differences compared to the HALS group in clinicopathological factors except for sex, blood loss was greater (1425 vs. 367 mL; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Risk factors for considering HALS during LLR were patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery including repeat hepatectomy, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, S7 or S8 tumor location, DS ≥ 7, and prolonged surgical time. Furthermore, uncontrollable intraoperative bleeding was an indication for open conversion.
Keywords: Conversion; HALS; Hand assisted; Hepatectomy; Laparoscopic liver resection.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
A propensity-matched study of full laparoscopic versus hand-assisted minimal-invasive liver surgery.Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2021-2028. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07597-2. Epub 2020 Apr 28. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 32347389
-
Appropriate indications for laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy.BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02208-y. BMC Surg. 2023. PMID: 37875912 Free PMC article.
-
The Outcome of Conversion to Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Laparoscopic Liver Resection.J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 21;12(14):4808. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144808. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37510923 Free PMC article.
-
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis.World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec 4;15(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1277-2. World J Surg Oncol. 2017. PMID: 29202820 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study.Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):1914-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9070-4. Epub 2003 Oct 28. Surg Endosc. 2003. PMID: 14574547 Review.
Cited by
-
Factors associated with conversion in laparoscopic surgery in a low-resource setting: a single-center prospective study.Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):8072-8079. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10373-7. Epub 2023 Aug 28. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37640956
-
Gender-based variations in surgical management of colorectal liver metastases: comprehensive analysis.BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13612-3. BMC Cancer. 2025. PMID: 39984882 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of obesity on short-term outcomes after the laparoscopic liver resection: a single-institution experience.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Mar;19(1):83-90. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.134104. Epub 2023 Dec 29. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024. PMID: 38974770 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J, Budin R (1991) Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol 78:956–958 - PubMed
-
- Buell JF, Thomas MT, Rudich S, Marvin M, Nagubandi R, Ravindra KV, Brock G, McMasters KM (2008) Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Ann Surg 248:475–486 - DOI
-
- Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841 - DOI
-
- Takahashi Y, Katagiri S, Ariizumi SI, Kotera Y, Egawa H, Wakabayashi G, Kaneko H, Yamamoto M (2017) Laparoscopic hepatectomy: current state in Japan based on the 4th Nationwide Questionnaire. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017:6868745 - DOI
-
- Hasegawa Y, Koffron AJ, Buell JF, Wakabayashi G (2015) Approaches to laparoscopic liver resection: a meta-analysis of the role of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and the hybrid technique. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:335–341 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical