Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Mar 6;22(1):64.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01549-1.

Documenting patients' and providers' preferences when proposing a randomized controlled trial: a qualitative exploration

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Documenting patients' and providers' preferences when proposing a randomized controlled trial: a qualitative exploration

Devesh Oberoi et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: With advances in cancer diagnosis and treatment, women with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) are living longer, increasing the number of patients receiving post-treatment follow-up care. Best-practice survivorship models recommend transitioning ESBC patients from oncology-provider (OP) care to community-based care. While developing materials for a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the feasibility of a nurse-led Telephone Survivorship Clinic (TSC) for a smooth transition of ESBC survivors to follow-up care, we explored patients' and OPs' reactions to several of our proposed methods.

Methods: We used a qualitative study design with thematic analysis and a two-pronged approach. We interviewed OPs, seeking feedback on ways to recruit their ESBC patients for the trial, and ESBC patients, seeking input on a questionnaire package assessing outcomes and processes in the trial.

Results: OPs identified facilitators and barriers and offered suggestions for study design and recruitment process improvement. Facilitators included the novelty and utility of the study and simplicity of methods; barriers included lack of coordination between treating and discharging clinicians, time constraints, language barriers, motivation, and using a paper-based referral letter. OPs suggested using a combination of electronic and paper referral letters and supporting clinicians to help with recruitment. Patient advisors reported satisfaction with the content and length of the assessment package. However, they questioned the relevance of some questions (childhood trauma) while adding questions about trust in physicians and proximity to primary-care providers.

Conclusions: OPs and patient advisors rated our methods for the proposed trial highly for their simplicity and relevance then suggested changes. These findings document processes that could be effective for cancer-patient recruitment in survivorship clinical trials.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Cancer care coordination; Cancer survivors; Oncology nurse; Telephone survivorship clinic; Transition of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Hortobagyi GN. The curability of breast cancer: present and future. Eur J Cancer Suppl. 2003;1(1):24–34. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6349(03)00003-X. - DOI
    1. Mitera G, Earle C, Latosinsky S, Booth C, Bezjak A, Desbiens C, et al. Choosing Wisely Canada cancer list: ten low-value or harmful practices that should be avoided in cancer care. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(3):e296–e303. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.004325. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panel CJSE, Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK, Chulak T, Mayo S, et al. Survivorship services for adult cancer populations: a pan-Canadian guideline. Curr Oncol. 2011;18(6):e265. doi: 10.3747/co.v18i6.956. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sussman J, Souter LH, Grunfeld E, Howell D, Gage C, Keller-Olaman S, et al. Models of care for cancer survivorship. Sussman J, Fletcher G, reviewers. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario; 2012
    1. Grant M, De Rossi S, Sussman J. Supporting models to transition breast cancer survivors to primary care: formative evaluation of a Cancer Care Ontario initiative. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(3):e288–e295. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.003822. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types