What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

doi:10.11124/JBIES-21-00483

. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):950-952.

doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00483.

What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

Zachary Munn¹, Danielle Pollock¹, Hanan Khalil², Lyndsay Alexander^{3

4}, Patricia Mclnerney⁵, Christina M Godfrey⁶, Micah Peters^{7

8

9}, Andrea C Tricco^{6

10

11}

Affiliations

¹ JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
² La Trobe University, School of Psychology and Public Health, Department of Public Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
³ School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
⁴ The Scottish Centre for Evidence-based, Multi-professional Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Aberdeen, UK.
⁵ The Wits-JBI Centre for Evidenced-Based Practice: A JBI Affiliated Group, University of the Witwa-tersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
⁶ Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Queen's University School of Nursing, Kingston, ON, Canada.
⁷ University of South Australia, Clinical and Health Sciences, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
⁸ Adelaide Nursing School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
⁹ The Centre for Evidence-based Practice South Australia (CEPSA): A JBI Centre of Excellence, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
¹⁰ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
¹¹ Epidemiology Division and Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

PMID: 35249995
DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00483

What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

Zachary Munn et al. JBI Evid Synth. 2022.

. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):950-952.

doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00483.

Authors

Zachary Munn¹, Danielle Pollock¹, Hanan Khalil², Lyndsay Alexander^{3

4}, Patricia Mclnerney⁵, Christina M Godfrey⁶, Micah Peters^{7

8

9}, Andrea C Tricco^{6

10

11}

Affiliations

¹ JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
² La Trobe University, School of Psychology and Public Health, Department of Public Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
³ School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
⁴ The Scottish Centre for Evidence-based, Multi-professional Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Aberdeen, UK.
⁵ The Wits-JBI Centre for Evidenced-Based Practice: A JBI Affiliated Group, University of the Witwa-tersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
⁶ Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Queen's University School of Nursing, Kingston, ON, Canada.
⁷ University of South Australia, Clinical and Health Sciences, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
⁸ Adelaide Nursing School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
⁹ The Centre for Evidence-based Practice South Australia (CEPSA): A JBI Centre of Excellence, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
¹⁰ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
¹¹ Epidemiology Division and Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

PMID: 35249995
DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00483

Abstract

Evidence synthesis encompasses a broad range of review types, and scoping reviews are an increasingly popular approach to synthesizing evidence in a number of fields. They sit alongside other evidence synthesis methodologies, such as systematic reviews, qualitative evidence synthesis, realist synthesis, and many more. Until now, scoping reviews have been variously defined in the literature. In this article, we provide the following formal definition for scoping reviews: Scoping reviews are a type of evidence synthesis that aims to systematically identify and map the breadth of evidence available on a particular topic, field, concept, or issue, often irrespective of source (ie, primary research, reviews, non-empirical evidence) within or across particular contexts. Scoping reviews can clarify key concepts/definitions in the literature and identify key characteristics or factors related to a concept, including those related to methodological research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Cited by

The Use of Mechanical Ventilation Support at the End of Life in Motor Neurone Disease/Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Scoping Review.
Wilson E, Lee JS, Wenzel D, Faull C. Wilson E, et al. Brain Sci. 2022 Aug 30;12(9):1162. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091162. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 36138898 Free PMC article.
Association between spinal and non-spinal health conditions reported in epidemiological studies: a scoping review protocol.
Green BN, Johnson CD, Crawford C, Tavares PA, Murnaghan K, Haldeman S, Hurwitz EL, Yang H, de Luca K. Green BN, et al. BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 3;13(10):e075382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075382. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37788930 Free PMC article.
A tale of two stories: COVID-19 and disability. A critical scoping review of the literature on the effects of the pandemic among athletes with disabilities and para-athletes.
Puce L, Trabelsi K, Ammar A, Jabbour G, Marinelli L, Mori L, Kong JD, Tsigalou C, Cotellessa F, Schenone C, Samanipour MH, Biz C, Ruggieri P, Trompetto C, Bragazzi NL. Puce L, et al. Front Physiol. 2022 Nov 9;13:967661. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.967661. eCollection 2022. Front Physiol. 2022. PMID: 36439247 Free PMC article.
Defining and assessing psychological frailty in older adults: a scoping review protocol.
Lameirinhas J, Gorostiaga A, Etxeberria I. Lameirinhas J, et al. BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 4;14(3):e080179. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080179. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38443084 Free PMC article.
Factors associated with patients' demand for low-value care: a scoping review.
Fraser GRL, Lambooij MS, van Exel J, Ostelo RWJG, van Harreveld F, de Wit GA. Fraser GRL, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 28;24(1):1656. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12093-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39731121 Free PMC article.

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 2014;5 (4):371–385.
1. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16 (1):1–10.
1. Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64 (1):11–20.
1. Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18 (1):5.
1. Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev 2012;1 (1):1–9.

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
- Wolters Kluwer

[1] Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 2014;5 (4):371–385.

[2] Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 2014;5 (4):371–385.

[3] Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16 (1):1–10.

[4] Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16 (1):1–10.

[5] Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64 (1):11–20.

[6] Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64 (1):11–20.

[7] Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18 (1):5.

[8] Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18 (1):5.

[9] Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev 2012;1 (1):1–9.

[10] Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev 2012;1 (1):1–9.

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

Affiliations

What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources