What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

doi:10.11124/JBIES-21-00483

. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):950-952.

doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00483.

What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

Zachary Munn¹, Danielle Pollock¹, Hanan Khalil², Lyndsay Alexander^{3

4}, Patricia Mclnerney⁵, Christina M Godfrey⁶, Micah Peters^{7

8

9}, Andrea C Tricco^{6

10

11}

Affiliations

¹ JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
² La Trobe University, School of Psychology and Public Health, Department of Public Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
³ School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
⁴ The Scottish Centre for Evidence-based, Multi-professional Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Aberdeen, UK.
⁵ The Wits-JBI Centre for Evidenced-Based Practice: A JBI Affiliated Group, University of the Witwa-tersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
⁶ Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Queen's University School of Nursing, Kingston, ON, Canada.
⁷ University of South Australia, Clinical and Health Sciences, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
⁸ Adelaide Nursing School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
⁹ The Centre for Evidence-based Practice South Australia (CEPSA): A JBI Centre of Excellence, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
¹⁰ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
¹¹ Epidemiology Division and Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

PMID: 35249995
DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00483

What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

Zachary Munn et al. JBI Evid Synth. 2022.

. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):950-952.

doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00483.

Authors

Zachary Munn¹, Danielle Pollock¹, Hanan Khalil², Lyndsay Alexander^{3

4}, Patricia Mclnerney⁵, Christina M Godfrey⁶, Micah Peters^{7

8

9}, Andrea C Tricco^{6

10

11}

Affiliations

¹ JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
² La Trobe University, School of Psychology and Public Health, Department of Public Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
³ School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
⁴ The Scottish Centre for Evidence-based, Multi-professional Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Aberdeen, UK.
⁵ The Wits-JBI Centre for Evidenced-Based Practice: A JBI Affiliated Group, University of the Witwa-tersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
⁶ Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Queen's University School of Nursing, Kingston, ON, Canada.
⁷ University of South Australia, Clinical and Health Sciences, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
⁸ Adelaide Nursing School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
⁹ The Centre for Evidence-based Practice South Australia (CEPSA): A JBI Centre of Excellence, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
¹⁰ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
¹¹ Epidemiology Division and Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

PMID: 35249995
DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00483

Abstract

Evidence synthesis encompasses a broad range of review types, and scoping reviews are an increasingly popular approach to synthesizing evidence in a number of fields. They sit alongside other evidence synthesis methodologies, such as systematic reviews, qualitative evidence synthesis, realist synthesis, and many more. Until now, scoping reviews have been variously defined in the literature. In this article, we provide the following formal definition for scoping reviews: Scoping reviews are a type of evidence synthesis that aims to systematically identify and map the breadth of evidence available on a particular topic, field, concept, or issue, often irrespective of source (ie, primary research, reviews, non-empirical evidence) within or across particular contexts. Scoping reviews can clarify key concepts/definitions in the literature and identify key characteristics or factors related to a concept, including those related to methodological research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Cited by

Ocular dryness in intensive care: proposal for a new nursing diagnosis.
Araújo JNM, Fernandes APNL, Dantas AC, Ferreira Júnior MA, Lopes MVO, Vitor AF. Araújo JNM, et al. Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Nov 13;76Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e20220698. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0698. eCollection 2023. Rev Bras Enferm. 2023. PMID: 37971054 Free PMC article.
Factors determining safety culture in hospitals: a scoping review.
Carvalho REFL, Bates DW, Syrowatka A, Almeida I, Sousa L, Goncalves J, Oliveira N, Gama M, Alencar AP. Carvalho REFL, et al. BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4):e002310. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002310. BMJ Open Qual. 2023. PMID: 37816540 Free PMC article.
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different- the "Big Picture" review family.
Campbell F, Tricco AC, Munn Z, Pollock D, Saran A, Sutton A, White H, Khalil H. Campbell F, et al. Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 15;12(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02178-5. Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36918977 Free PMC article.
Understanding Quality of Life for People with Motor Neurone Disease Who Use Tracheostomy Ventilation and Family Members: A Scoping Review.
Turner N, Faull C, Palmer J, Armstrong A, Bedford J, Turner MR, Wilson E. Turner N, et al. Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 16;14(8):821. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080821. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 39199512 Free PMC article.
Characteristics of the studies using realist evaluation to assess interventions that address psychosocial healthcare issues in older adults: a scoping review.
Mitani S, Ogawara H, Haruta J, Sakakibara T, Fukahori H. Mitani S, et al. BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 30;14(8):e078256. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078256. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39214655 Free PMC article.

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 2014;5 (4):371–385.
1. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16 (1):1–10.
1. Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64 (1):11–20.
1. Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18 (1):5.
1. Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev 2012;1 (1):1–9.

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
- Wolters Kluwer

[1] Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 2014;5 (4):371–385.

[2] Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 2014;5 (4):371–385.

[3] Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16 (1):1–10.

[4] Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16 (1):1–10.

[5] Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64 (1):11–20.

[6] Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64 (1):11–20.

[7] Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18 (1):5.

[8] Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18 (1):5.

[9] Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev 2012;1 (1):1–9.

[10] Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev 2012;1 (1):1–9.

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

Affiliations

What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources