Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 18:16:775724.
doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.775724. eCollection 2022.

Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor for Gait Reconstruction in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor for Gait Reconstruction in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Study

Soichiro Koyama et al. Front Neurorobot. .

Abstract

Wearable robotic exoskeletons (WREs) have been developed from orthoses as assistive devices for gait reconstruction in patients with spinal cord injury. They can solve some problems encountered with orthoses, such as difficulty in independent walking and standing up and high energy consumption during walking. The Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor (WPAL), a WRE, was developed based on a knee-ankle-foot orthosis with a single medial hip joint. The WPAL has been updated seven times during the period from the beginning of its development, in 2005, to 2020. The latest version, launched as a commercialized model in 2016, is available for medical facilities. In this retrospective study, which included updated results from previous reports, all data were extracted from development research records from July 2007 to December 2020. The records were as follows: patient characteristics [the number of participants, injury level, and the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) score], the total number of WPAL trials when aggregating the cases with all the versions or only the latest version of the WPAL, and maximum walking performance (functional ambulation category [FAC], distance, and time of continuous walking). Thirty-one patients participated in the development research. The levels of spinal cord injury were cervical (C5-C8), upper thoracic (T3-T6), lower thoracic (T7-T12), and lumbar (L1) in 10, 5, 15, and 1 of the patients, respectively. The numbers of patients with AIS scores of A, B, C, and D were 20, 7, 4, and 0, respectively. The total number of WPAL trials was 1,785, of which 1,009 were used the latest version of the WPAL. Twenty of the patients achieved an FAC score of 4 after an average of 9 (median 8, range 2-22) WPAL trials. The continuous walking distance and time improved with the WPAL were compared to the orthosis. We confirmed that the WPAL improves walking independence in people with a wide range of spinal cord injuries, such as cervical spinal cord injuries. Further refinement of the WPAL will enable its long-term use at home.

Keywords: clinical experience; gait; paraplegia; tetraplegia; wearable robotic exoskeleton.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
State transition diagram for the WPAL operation. WPAL, Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The structure of the latest WPAL in detail. (A) The hip joint in frontal view, (B) the knee joint in frontal view, and (C) the ankle joint in frontal view. WPAL, Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparisons of gait performance between the conventional orthosis and the WPAL. (A) Maximum FAC score, (B) continuous walking distance, and (C) continuous walking time. Each box represents 25–75% percentile and whiskers represent 5–95 percentile. Asterisk indicates statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). FAC, functional ambulation category; WPAL, Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arazpour M., Bani M. A., Hutchins S. W., Jones R. K. (2013). The physiological cost index of walking with mechanical and powered gait orthosis in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 51, 356–359. 10.1038/sc.2012.162 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asselin P., Knezevic S., Kornfeld S., Cirnigliaro C., Agranova-Breyter I., Bauman W. A., et al. . (2015). Heart rate and oxygen demand of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with paraplegia. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 52, 147–158. 10.1682/JRRD.2014.02.0060 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benson I., Hart K., Tussler D., van Middendorp J. J. (2016). Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study. Clin. Rehabil. 30, 73–84. 10.1177/0269215515575166 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Birch N., Graham J., Priestley T., Heywood C., Sakel M., Gall A., et al. . (2017). Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 14, 60. 10.1186/s12984-017-0274-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bjornshave Noe B., Mikkelsen E. M., Hansen R. M., Thygesen M., Hagen E. M. (2015). Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury in Denmark, 1990-2012: a hospital-based study. Spinal Cord. 53, 436–440. 10.1038/sc.2014.181 - DOI - PubMed